Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37520047›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2023

The impact of small-for-gestational-age Status on the outcomes in very-Low-birth-weight (VLBW) premature infants: a prospective cohort study in Taiwan.

Chia-Ying Lin, Hung-Yang Chang, Jui-Hsing Chang, Chyong-Hsin Hsu, Wai-Tim Jim, Chun-Chih Peng, Chia-Huei Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Expected and Desirable Preterm and Small Infant Growth Patterns.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chia-Ying LinDepartment of Pediatrics, MacKay Children's Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hung-Yang ChangDepartment of Pediatrics, MacKay Children's Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jui-Hsing ChangDepartment of Pediatrics, MacKay Children's Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chyong-Hsin HsuDepartment of Pediatrics, MacKay Children's Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wai-Tim JimDepartment of Pediatrics, MacKay Children's Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chun-Chih PengDepartment of Pediatrics, MacKay Children's Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Huei ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, MacKay Children's Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Mackay Memorial Hospital · TWMackay Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The impact of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) on very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) premature infants remains inconclusive. This study aimed to assess the effects of being born SGA status on the short-term and long-term outcomes in VLBW preterm infants. Methods: We conducted a population-based, prospective cohort study on VLBW preterm infants born in Taiwan between 2012 and 2017. Sociodemographic, neonatal, growth and neurological data at 2 years of corrected age were collected. A total of 4243 VLBW infants born at 24 through 32 completed weeks' gestation participated in this study, of whom 1,005 had SGA status defined as a birth weight <10th percentile of gestation, and 3,238 did not (the non-SGA group).We compared the risks of short-term outcomes (neonatal mortality and morbidities), long-term outcomes (growth status, including weight, height, and head circumference <10th percentile, and neurodevelopmental impairments at 2 years of age). Subgroup analysis was performed by stratification of gestation age (GA): GA 24-26, 27-29 and 30-32 weeks. Results: In the analysis of short-term outcomes, the SGA group had an increased risk of neonatal mortality [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.66, 2.99, and 2.19, respectively] in all GA subgroups in comparison with the non-SGA group ( Conclusions: SGA VLBW premature infants had higher risks of neonatal death, growth status <10th percentile, and NDI at 2 years of corrected age compared with the non- SGA premature infants. Prenatal surveillance, postnatal attention, and long- term follow-up are warranted to improve the outcomes of VLBW SGA premature infants.

Indexed as

children developmentpreterm infantsSGAsmall-for-gestational agevery-low-birth-weight infantVLBW

Identifiers

PMID37520047
PMCPMC10376714
OpenAlexW4384281822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.