ReviewJPRAS open2023
Reconstruction of the thoracic radiation-induced ulcer with the pedicled internal mammary artery fasciocutaneous flap: Review of the literature and a case report.
Review in JPRAS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extended applications of chest wall perforator flaps in breast surgery: case series and systematic literature review.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Pooled it
- Reconstructive Management for Chest Wall Radiation-induced Ulcers Following Mastectomy.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Latissimus Dorsi Flap for Radiation-induced Chest Wall Ulcers.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- [Treatment strategy for severe radiation-induced ulcers near major blood vessels].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025Observational
- Navigating the Complexities of Radiation Injuries: Therapeutic Principles and Reconstructive Strategies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The pedicled Internal Mammary Artery Perforator (IMAP) flap is not yet a well-known technique. However, it seems practical for use in thoracic radiation-induced ulcer, especially in recurrence after the failure of convenient reconstructive techniques. This technique is applied to patients with breast hypertrophy. In this article, we present our experience with the indications, surgery details, and advantages of this technique. Materials and methods: A 63-year-old woman had a right mastectomy 11 years ago. The patient's ulcers recurred after radiotherapy and were treated with a regional and local flap. The opposite breast was ptotic, and the patient was not eligible for microsurgery. The patient underwent reconstruction using the contralateral pedicle IMAP flap. Results: The IMAP flap was designed with a size of 14 × 22 cm, including the inferior half of the breast and the areolar. The flap could completely cover the chest wall defect, and the contralateral breast was reduced to match. The final results were evaluated after two years of follow-up. Conclusion: The contralateral breast pedicle IMAP flap is a reliable, versatile, and easy-to-perform technique. This flap is a useful technique for chest wall coverage after radiation-induced ulcers, particularly in elderly patients. The major limitation of this technique is the higher risk of second primary breast cancer as the transfer flap of the contralateral breast.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.