ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023
3D U-Net Segmentation Improves Root System Reconstruction from 3D MRI Images in Automated and Manual Virtual Reality Work Flows.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lipid MRI in plant science: principles and potential areas of application.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- DeepBranchAI: a transferable 3D segmentation model for branching networks.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- VRoot: A VR-Based application for manual root system architecture reconstruction.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- MRI-Seed-Wizard: combining deep learning algorithms with magnetic resonance imaging enables advanced seed phenotyping.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Article
- The diagnostic value of MRI segmentation technique for shoulder joint injuries based on deep learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Convolutional neural networks combined with conventional filtering to semantically segment plant roots in rapidly scanned X-ray computed tomography volumes with high noise levels.Plant methods · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to image root systems grown in opaque soil. However, reconstruction of root system architecture (RSA) from 3-dimensional (3D) MRI images is challenging. Low resolution and poor contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) hinder automated reconstruction. Hence, manual reconstruction is still widely used. Here, we evaluate a novel 2-step work flow for automated RSA reconstruction. In the first step, a 3D U-Net segments MRI images into root and soil in super-resolution. In the second step, an automated tracing algorithm reconstructs the root systems from the segmented images. We evaluated the merits of both steps for an MRI dataset of 8 lupine root systems, by comparing the automated reconstructions to manual reconstructions of unaltered and segmented MRI images derived with a novel virtual reality system. We found that the U-Net segmentation offers profound benefits in manual reconstruction: reconstruction speed was doubled (+97%) for images with low CNR and increased by 27% for images with high CNR. Reconstructed root lengths were increased by 20% and 3%, respectively. Therefore, we propose to use U-Net segmentation as a principal image preprocessing step in manual work flows. The root length derived by the tracing algorithm was lower than in both manual reconstruction methods, but segmentation allowed automated processing of otherwise not readily usable MRI images. Nonetheless, model-based functional root traits revealed similar hydraulic behavior of automated and manual reconstructions. Future studies will aim to establish a hybrid work flow that utilizes automated reconstructions as scaffolds that can be manually corrected.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.