Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37519934›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023

3D U-Net Segmentation Improves Root System Reconstruction from 3D MRI Images in Automated and Manual Virtual Reality Work Flows.

Tobias Selzner, Jannis Horn, Magdalena Landl, Andreas Pohlmeier, Dirk Helmrich, Katrin Huber, Jan Vanderborght, Harry Vereecken, Sven Behnke, Andrea Schnepf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tobias SelznerForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1454-5450
Jannis HornAutonomous Intelligence Systems Group, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0005-2727
Magdalena LandlForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8567-0454
Andreas PohlmeierForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7857-3667
Dirk HelmrichForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Juelich Supercomputing Center, Juelich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1542-1062
Katrin HuberForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4343-5886
Jan VanderborghtForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7381-3211
Harry VereeckenForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8051-8517
Sven BehnkeAutonomous Intelligence Systems Group, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5040-7525
Andrea SchnepfForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2203-4466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to image root systems grown in opaque soil. However, reconstruction of root system architecture (RSA) from 3-dimensional (3D) MRI images is challenging. Low resolution and poor contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) hinder automated reconstruction. Hence, manual reconstruction is still widely used. Here, we evaluate a novel 2-step work flow for automated RSA reconstruction. In the first step, a 3D U-Net segments MRI images into root and soil in super-resolution. In the second step, an automated tracing algorithm reconstructs the root systems from the segmented images. We evaluated the merits of both steps for an MRI dataset of 8 lupine root systems, by comparing the automated reconstructions to manual reconstructions of unaltered and segmented MRI images derived with a novel virtual reality system. We found that the U-Net segmentation offers profound benefits in manual reconstruction: reconstruction speed was doubled (+97%) for images with low CNR and increased by 27% for images with high CNR. Reconstructed root lengths were increased by 20% and 3%, respectively. Therefore, we propose to use U-Net segmentation as a principal image preprocessing step in manual work flows. The root length derived by the tracing algorithm was lower than in both manual reconstruction methods, but segmentation allowed automated processing of otherwise not readily usable MRI images. Nonetheless, model-based functional root traits revealed similar hydraulic behavior of automated and manual reconstructions. Future studies will aim to establish a hybrid work flow that utilizes automated reconstructions as scaffolds that can be manually corrected.

Identifiers

PMID37519934
PMCPMC10381537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.