ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2023
Towards comprehensive evaluation of the FLEXotendon glove-III: a case series evaluation in pediatric clinical cases and able-bodied adults.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Supporting upper limb movements with a soft robot after a brachial plexus injury.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Injuries involving the nervous system, such as a brachial plexus palsy or traumatic brain injury, can lead to impairment in the functionality of the hand. Assistive robotics have been proposed as a possible method to improve patient outcomes in rehabilitation. The work presented here evaluates the FLEXotendon Glove-III, a 5 degree-of-freedom, voice-controlled, tendon-driven soft robotic hand exoskeleton, with two human subjects with hand impairments and four able-bodied subjects. The FLEXotendon Glove-III was evaluated on four unimpaired subjects, in conjunction with EMG sensor data, to determine the quantitative performance of the glove in applied pinch force, perturbation resistance, and exertion reduction. The exoskeleton system was also evaluated on two subjects with hand impairments, using two standardized hand function tests, the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test and the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Hand Function Test. The subjects were also presented with three qualitative questionnaires, the Capabilities of Upper Extremities Questionnaire, the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology, and the Orthotics Prosthetics User Survey-Satisfaction module. From the previous design, minor design changes were made to the exoskeleton. The quick connect system was redesigned for improved performance, the number of motors was reduced to decrease overall footprint, and the entire system was placed into a compact acrylic case that can be placed into a backpack for increased portability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.