ArticleHeliyon2023
Magnitude and determinants of women's participation in household decision making among married women in Ethiopia, 2022: Based on Ethiopian demographic and health survey data.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Interpersonal factors associated with depression symptom severity among PrEP-naïve pregnant women in South Africa: a mixed-methods analysis.AIDS care · 2025Article
- Women Autonomy in Health Care Decision Making and Associated Factors Among Postpartum Women in Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Geospatial determinants and spatio-temporal variation of early initiation of breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding in Ethiopia from 2011 to 2019, a multiscale geographically weighted regression analysis.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Intra-household joint decision making on child feeding and associated social determinants in rural districts of South Ethiopia: a multi-site concurrent mixed method study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Women's strong decision-making abilities are essential to reducing maternal mortality rates. Because women's involvement in decision-making would increase uptake for healthcare services like maternal healthcare, which includes prenatal care (ANC), postnatal care (PNC), and facility delivery. Studies have revealed that women's decision-making autonomy is low, particularly in underdeveloped nations like Ethiopia. Investigating potential factors that may influence women's participation in household decision-making is the primary goal of this study project. Methods: Secondary data analysis was carried out using data from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS). For the final analysis we used a weighted sample of 10,223 currently married women. All the frequencies and the percentages in the result section are weighted. The model's fitness was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. It is the best fit (p value = 0.19). Variables with p values ≤ 0.2 in the bi-variable binary logistic regression analysis were included in the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. The Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was computed. Variables with a Result: The overall magnitude of women's participation in decision making among was 70.55% (CI: 69.65, 71.42). Residence (rural; AOR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.980), educational status (None educated; AOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.62, primary education AOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.69), religion (protestant AOR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.81), Muslim; AOR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.96, Others; AOR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.87), wealth index (poor; AOR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.79, middle; AOR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.85), working status (Not working; AOR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.80), husband working status (husband not working; AOR:1.69, 95% CI: 1.43, 2.0) and sex of household head (female heads; AOR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.54) were statistically significant factors. Conclusion: Generally women's participation in household decision making in our study was high (70.55%). It is highly affected by socio demographic and economic characteristics of women and husbands characteristics. This study indicates that educating women, improving their economic status through employment opportunities, empowering women to be head of household will enhance their participation on household decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.