Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37519695›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Clustering energy support beliefs to reveal unique sub-populations using self-organizing maps.

Heather Bedle, Christopher R H Garneau, Alexandro Vera-Arroyo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather BedleSchool of Geosciences, University of Oklahoma, USA.
Christopher R H GarneauDepartment of Sociology, University of Oklahoma, USA.
Alexandro Vera-ArroyoSchool of Geosciences, University of Oklahoma, USA.
University of Oklahoma · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Americans' support for energy sources is quite complex and dependent on a range of socio-demographic characteristics. In a novel approach to investigate energy opinions on renewables and fossil fuels, self-organizing maps are employed to cluster individuals solely on their energy beliefs using social survey data collected from Pew Research in the Spring of 2021. These energy preference clusters are then used in regression models to examine attitudes regarding energy policy in the United States. Results from the self-organizing map (SOM) analysis reveal four distinct clusters: energy traditionalists who oppose renewable sources due to partisan ideologies; energy renewers who strongly prefer investment in only renewable energy sources; energy universalists who universally support all forms of energy; and the aberrant cluster, individuals who prefer solar power greatly over wind energy but demonstrate no other energy preference patterns. Results from regression analyses reveal that SOM clusters are highly predictive of attitudes regarding energy policy. Taken together, these results reveal the unique capability of machine learning to categorize human attitudes - which should be of particular interest to energy policymakers when considering the opinions of the electorate.

Indexed as

Energy preferencesFossil fuelsRenewable energySelf-organizing maps

Identifiers

PMID37519695
PMCPMC10372731
OpenAlexW4384276919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.