Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37519689›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Autoencoder and restricted Boltzmann machine for transfer learning in functional magnetic resonance imaging task classification.

Jundong Hwang, Niv Lustig, Minyoung Jung, Jong-Hwan Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jundong HwangDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Niv LustigDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Minyoung JungDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jong-Hwan LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been adopted widely as classifiers for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, advancing beyond traditional machine learning models. Consequently, transfer learning of the pre-trained DNN becomes crucial to enhance DNN classification performance, specifically by alleviating an overfitting issue that occurs when a substantial number of DNN parameters are fitted to a relatively small number of fMRI samples. In this study, we first systematically compared the two most popularly used, unsupervised pretraining models for resting-state fMRI (rfMRI) volume data to pre-train the DNNs, namely autoencoder (AE) and restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM). The group in-brain mask used when training AE and RBM displayed a sizable overlap ratio with Yeo's seven functional brain networks (FNs). The parcellated FNs obtained from the RBM were fine-grained compared to those from the AE. The pre-trained AE and RBM served as the weight parameters of the first of the two hidden DNN layers, and the DNN fulfilled the task classifier role for fMRI (tfMRI) data in the Human Connectome Project (HCP). We tested two transfer learning schemes: (1) fixing and (2) fine-tuning the DNN's pre-trained AE or RBM weights. The DNN with transfer learning was compared to a baseline DNN, trained using random initial weights. Overall, DNN classification performance from the transfer learning proved superior when the pre-trained RBM weights were fixed and when the pre-trained AE weights were fine-tuned (average error rates: 14.8% for fixed RBM, 15.1% fine-tuned AE, and 15.5% for the baseline model) compared to the alternative scenarios of DNN transfer learning schemes. Moreover, the optimal transfer learning scheme between the fixed RBM and fine-tuned AE varied according to seven task conditions in the HCP. Nonetheless, the computational load reduced substantially for the fixed-weight-based transfer learning compared to the fine-tuning-based transfer learning (e.g., the number of weight parameters for the fixed-weight-based DNN model reduced to 1.9% compared with a baseline/fine-tuned DNN model). Our findings suggest that weight initialization at the DNN's first layer using RBM-based pre-trained weights provides the most promising approach when the whole-brain fMRI volume supports associated task classification. We believe that our proposed scheme could be applied to a variety of task conditions to improve their classification performance and to utilize computational resources efficiently using our AE/RBM-based pre-trained weights compared to random initial weights for DNN training.

Indexed as

AutoencoderDeep neural networkFunctional magnetic resonance imagingHuman connectome projectRestricted Boltzmann machineTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37519689
PMCPMC10372668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.