ReviewCureus2023
Safety and Efficacy of Istaroxime in Patients With Acute Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Istaroxime in Acute Heart Failure and Early Cardiogenic Shock: A Calcium-Cycling Approach to Inotropic Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Development of Small-molecule SERCA2a Stimulators: A Novel Class of Ino-lusitropic Agents.European cardiology · 2025Review
- Istaroxime for Patients with Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Evaluation of the Anticancer and Biological Activities of Istaroxime via Ex Vivo Analyses, Molecular Docking and Conceptual Density Functional Theory Computations.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of istaroxime in patients with heart failure. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted on the EMBASE and Medline databases to identify articles related to the safety and efficacy of istaroxime in patients with heart failure. The search covered the period from inception to May 31st, 2023, without any restrictions on the year of publication. The search strategy utilized relevant terms such as "istaroxime," "heart failure", "efficacy," and other related terms, along with their corresponding Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. The outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), E to A ratio (a marker of left ventricle function), cardiac index in L/min/m2, systolic blood pressure (SBP) in mmHg, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) in ml, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVDSV) in ml. For safety analysis, gastrointestinal events and cardiovascular events were assessed. A total of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis encompassing 211 patients with heart failure. Pooled analysis showed that istaroxime was effective in increasing LVEF (MD: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.91 to 1.62, p-value: 0.001), reducing E to A ratio (MD: -0.39, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.19, p-value: 0.001), increasing cardiac index (MD: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.25, p-value: 0.001), reducing LVESV (MD: -11.84, 95% CI: -13.91 to -9.78, p-value: 0.001), reducing LVEDV (MD: -12.25, 95% CI: -14.63 to -9.87, p-value: 0.001) and increasing SBP (MD: 8.41, 95% CI: 5.23 to 11.60, p-value: 0.001) compared to the placebo group. However, risk of gastrointestinal events was significantly higher in patients receiving istaroxime compared to the placebo group (RR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.53 to 4.57, p-value: 0.0005). These findings support the enhancement of heart function with istaroxime administration, aligning with previous clinical and experimental evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.