ReviewCureus2023
Unmasking a Silent Killer and Understanding Sudden Cardiac Death in Brugada Syndrome: A Traditional Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an intricate and heterogeneous genetic disorder that engenders a formidable risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). While initially regarded as an electrophysiological aberration, emergent studies have illuminated the presence of underlying structural anomalies in select BrS cases. Although mutations in the SCN5A gene encoding the α-subunit of the cardiac sodium channel were originally identified as a primary causative factor; they account for only a fraction of the syndrome's multifaceted complexity pointing at genetic heterogeneity as a contributing factor. Remarkably, BrS has been linked to a higher incidence of fatal arrhythmic incidents and sudden cardiac death (SCD) with about 4% of SCD cases thought to be caused by BrS. Patients who spontaneously exhibit type one Brugada ECGs are more likely to experience cardiac events, emphasizing the importance of early risk stratification. To aid in risk stratification, the Shanghai score; a multifactorial risk stratification scoring system that incorporates ECG, clinical history, family history, and genetic test results; is utilized to identify those most susceptible to SCD. Beyond single ECGs, evaluation of arrhythmic findings from 24-hour Holter monitoring, ECG variables, electrophysiologic study (EPS) status in the temporal domain, and EPS data collected over time are all critical factors in risk classification. Among management options avoidance of triggers, early risk stratification, and implantation of an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) are recommended for asymptomatic patients. For symptomatic patients, pharmacotherapy and ICD implantation are available, with the latter being a highly effective choice for treating and preventing lethal arrhythmias in BrS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.