ArticleCureus2023
Does an Adductor Canal Block Influence Patient-Reported Outcomes at One Year Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis is performed to improve knee function and quality of life. Adductor canal block (ACB) (with posterior capsule local anaesthetic) and periarticular local anaesthetic infiltration (LA) alone are common methods used for post-operative pain control following TKA. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the influence of ACB compared to LA alone on knee function at one year in patients undergoing primary TKA. The secondary aims were to investigate the influence on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), patient satisfaction at one year, and length of stay (LOS) in hospital following TKA. Methods During a three-year period, 1396 patients who underwent TKA at the study centre completed pre-operative and one-year post-operative questionnaires. Data collected included patient demographics, co-morbidities, LOS, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) and satisfaction scores. Patients who had a spinal anaesthetic (n=1096) with either ACB (with posterior capsule local anaesthetic) (n=224) and LA infiltration alone (n=872) were compared. Results There was a significant improvement in pre-operative to one-year post-operative knee function as measured by OKS overall (15.1, p<0.001), however there was no significant difference between ACB and LA groups (p=0.37). There was no significant difference in change (p=0.43) or one-year post-operative (p=0.70) HRQoL, as measured by EQ-5D. There was also no significant difference in one-year patient satisfaction between groups (p=0.57). There was no significant difference in median LOS between groups (four days with ACB, four days with LA), although patients younger than 55 years undergoing ACB had a statistically significant median of one day reduced LOS compared with the LA group (p=0.01). Conclusions ACB when compared with LA alone was not associated with a difference in change in knee function, HRQoL, or patient satisfaction at one year following TKA. There was also no difference between groups in length of stay post-operatively. However, ACB was associated with a shorter length of stay in patients younger than 55, and this may be a group that would benefit from this intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.