ArticleCureus2023
Quality Improvement Initiative in a Community Hospital to Reduce Central Line Device Utilization Rate.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections using Lean Six Sigma methodology.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The intensive care unit (ICU) in a community hospital in southwest Minnesota saw a steady increase in central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and an increase in the utilization of central lines. The baseline CLABSI rate was 11.36 at the start of the project, which was the highest in the last five years. The corresponding device utilization rate (DUR) was 64%, which increased from a pre-COVID pandemic rate of 45%. Aim The aim of this project was to decrease the ICU DUR by 37.5% from a baseline of 64% to 40% within six months without adversely impacting staff satisfaction. Methods A multidisciplinary team using the define, measure, analyze, improve, and control (DMAIC) methodology reviewed the potential causes of the increased use of central lines in the ICU. The team identified the following major causal themes: process, communication, education, and closed-loop feedback. Once the root causes were determined, suitable countermeasures were identified and implemented to address these barriers. These included reviewing current guidelines, enhanced care team rounding, staff education, and the creation of a vascular access indication algorithm. The team met biweekly to study the current state, determine the future state, evaluate feedback, and guide implementation. Results The pandemic saw a surge in the number of severely ill patients in the ICU, which may have caused an increase in the DUR. The project heightened the awareness of the increased DUR and its impact on the CLABSI rate. The initiation of discussion around this project led to an immediate decline in DUR via increased awareness and focus. As interventions were introduced and implemented, the DUR continued to decrease at a steady rate. Post implementation, the DUR met the project goal of less than 40%. The team continued to track progress and monitor feedback. The DUR continued to meet the goal for three months post implementation. Since the start of the project, there have been no CLABSI events reported. This effort has positively impacted safety and patient outcomes. Conclusions Through a defined process, the central line utilization rate in our ICU was decreased to 37.5% to meet the target goal and has been sustained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.