Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37519508›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Cryotherapy for the Treatment of Tracheal Stenosis: A Systematic Review.

Asma Hosna, Muhammad Haseeb Ul Rasool, Nicole C Noff, Karim Makhoul, Daniel Miller, Zaryab Umar, Muhammad Ghallab, Rockyb Hasan, Salman Ashfaq, Avish Parikh and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Asma HosnaInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, USA.
Muhammad Haseeb Ul RasoolMedicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Queens Hospital Center, New York City, USA.
Nicole C NoffInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Queens Hospital Center, New York City, USA.
Karim MakhoulNeurology, Mount Sinai Queens, New York City, USA.
Daniel MillerInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Queens Hospital Center, New York City, USA.
Zaryab UmarInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Queens Hospital Center, New York City, USA.
Muhammad GhallabInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City Health and Hospitals, New York City, USA.
Rockyb HasanInternal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center - Amarillo Campus, Lubbock, USA.
Salman AshfaqInternal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, PAK.
Avish ParikhInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Queens Hospital Center, New York City, USA.
Ricardo LopezInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Queens Hospital Center, New York City, USA.
Allama Iqbal Medical College · PKMount Sinai Queens · USTexas Tech University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMount Sinai Hospital · USNew York City Health and Hospitals Corporation · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracheal stenosis (TS) is an iatrogenic sequela after intubation or tracheostomy that is increasing despite technological improvement and skilled respiratory care in the ICU. According to the studies, the rate of TS varies from 10 to 22%, but only 1-2% of these stenoses are severe and present with inspiratory dyspnea that does not respond to medical management. Bronchoscopy is considered the most appropriate diagnostic test, and laser surgery and tracheobronchial stenting are the most commonly performed procedures for tracheal stenosis. However, alternative treatment options, including cryotherapy for inoperable patients, have yet to be studied widely. As the number of patients requiring ICU admission with mechanical intubation is increasing, it is crucial to acknowledge this complication and consider alternative management options. Here we present a review of the use of cryotherapy for post-intubation tracheal stenosis.  Pubmed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were inquired for studies performed using the keywords 'airway stricture' OR 'airway obstruction' AND 'post-intubation' OR 'post-extubation' OR 'tracheostomy' AND 'cryotherapy'. After the primary and secondary screening, five studies were included in the analysis.  We included 67 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 50.2 (range: 42-55) years. Tracheal stenosis and subglottic stricture were the most common sites of stenosis. Twenty-nine patients were treated with cryotherapy only, while the rest 38 patients had cryotherapy followed by balloon dilation. After the intervention, 48 patients experienced improvement, five experienced no change in the symptoms, 13 patients were asymptomatic before the treatment, and one died. No complication was reported in 65 patients, with only minor complications reported in rest.  Although, there is no clear treatment protocol for patients with inoperable tracheal stenosis. Our review demonstrates that cryotherapy for inoperable tracheal stenosis can be an acceptable alternative treatment with significant clinical improvement. Additionally, cryotherapy has fewer adverse effects compared to other treatment options.

Indexed as

advanced diseasecryotherapylung cancerradiotherapystent placement

Identifiers

PMID37519508
PMCPMC10372464
OpenAlexW4382302059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.