Is There a Predictable Cost-Benefit Ratio in Preeclampsia?

Background Preeclampsia (PE) is one of the highest-risk pregnancies and a complicated condition that occurs in 2% to 8% of pregnancies and is associated with markers of a systemic inflammatory response (SIR). In this study, we aimed to determine the role of these markers in predicting PE. Methodology A total of 300 women with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation were included in the study. Normotensive pregnant women (n = 149) who met this criterion were included as the control group Pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria for a diagnosis of preeclampsia (n = 151) were included in the study group. Results The baseline characteristics of the study groups showed no significant difference. The hypertensive group was hospitalized significantly earlier than the control group (p < 0.001). We found significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure values in the PE group than in the other group (p < 0.001). The mean neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) values at hospitalization did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.639, p = 0.709, and p = 0.066, respectively). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis curves compared with the control group and PE, none of the parameters could predict PE. Conclusions We found that NLR, PLR, and APRI have no clinical significance in assessing developmental risk and predicting PE.