Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37519479›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma & dissociation = Revue europeenne du trauma et de la dissociation2023

Stress and coping strategies in the general population of Greece and Cyprus in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.

E Kleanthous, E Evangelou, A Georgiadou, P Galanis, E Andreadaki, C Tzavara, D Kaitelidou, G Kallergis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma & dissociation = Revue europeenne du trauma et de la dissociation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E KleanthousDepartment of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences, Athens, Greece.
E EvangelouDepartment of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.
A GeorgiadouDepartment of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences, Athens, Greece.
P GalanisDepartment of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences, Athens, Greece.
E AndreadakiHellenic National Defence, Medical Directorate, Centre of Cognitive Sciences and Psychometrics, Athens, Greece.
C TzavaraFaculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
D KaitelidouDepartment of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences, Athens, Greece.
G KallergisDepartment of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRCyprus University of Technology · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown policy had a profound psychological impact on the general population worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the level of stress and coping strategies used during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak and their association. Secondary aims were to a) identify the most important coping strategies and b) investigate predictors of stress. A cross-sectional study was conducted by using an anonymous online questionnaire. The study was carried out from April 23 to May 4 2020. A snowball sampling method was conducted to recruit potential participants from the general population of Greece and Cyprus. Participants over 18 years old who were familiar with the Greek language were included. The psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). Coping strategies were assessed using 15 statements detected from a review of the literature. Participants were asked to rate each one of the coping strategies according to how important it was to them, on a four-point likert scale. The sample consisted of 3941 participants (74.2% women, N=2926), with a mean age of 36.9 years old. The most important coping strategies adopted were 1) "Dealing the situation with a positive attitude" (96.5%), 2) "Follow strict personal protective measures" (95,9%), 3) "Acquiring knowledge about coronavirus" (94.6%), 4) "Engaging in health-promoting behaviors" (89.6%), 5) "Limiting the time spent on media" (75.5%). The highest and positive coefficients were recorded for the association of IES-R scales with 1) "Talking with family and friends to reduce stress", 2) "Seeking help from a mental health professional", 3) "Limiting the time spent on media", 4) "Relieving and managing emotions", 5) "Practicing relaxation techniques". 26.5% showed severe psychological impact.

Indexed as

Coping strategiesCOVID-19Cross-sectional studiesStress disorderstraumatic

Identifiers

PMID37519479
PMCPMC9657898
OpenAlexW4309047316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.