Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37519359›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Executive functions scale for university students: UEF-1.

Carlos Ramos-Galarza, Valentina Ramos, Milenko Del Valle, Nancy Lepe-Martínez, Jorge Cruz-Cárdenas, Pamela Acosta-Rodas, Mónica Bolaños-Pasquel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos Ramos-GalarzaFacultad de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Valentina RamosGrupo de Investigación en Sistemas de Información, Gestión de la Tecnología e Innovación, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito, Ecuador.
Milenko Del ValleFacutlad de Ciencias Sociales, Artes y Humanidades, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile.
Nancy Lepe-MartínezFacutlad de Ciencias de la Educacion, Departamento de Diversidad e Inclusividad Educativa, Talca, Chile.
Jorge Cruz-CárdenasCentro de Investigación ESTec, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Quito, Ecuador.
Pamela Acosta-RodasFacultad de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Mónica Bolaños-PasquelCentro de Mecatrónica y Sistemas Interactivos MIST, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Quito, Ecuador.
Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica · ECPontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador · ECUniversidad de Las Américas · ECUniversity of Antofagasta · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Executive functions are a set of mental abilities that allow human beings to consciously regulate their behavior and, in a university setting, will have a significant impact on student success during professional training. Objective: To develop a scale to assess executive functions in a university setting. Method: Using a sample of 1,373 university students from Chile (663) and Ecuador (710) between 17 and 33 years old ( Results: Adequate internal consistency parameters were found between Discussion: The research carried out reaches its conclusion stating that the scale that was developed has the psychometric properties to assess executive functions in the Latin American setting. The results regarding previous research and the contribution made in the line of research of executive functions are discussed.

Indexed as

academic performancebehaviorexecutive functionslearninguniversity students

Identifiers

PMID37519359
PMCPMC10372484
OpenAlexW4384273441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.