Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37519343›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2023

Safety reporting of Essure medical device: a qualitative and quantitative assessment on the FDA manufacturer and user facility device experience database in 2018.

Chenyu Zou, Brandy Davis, Patricia R Wigle, Ana L Hincapie, Jeff Jianfei Guo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Care Pathways and Determinants in Essure® Contraceptive Implant Use and Removal: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chenyu ZouDepartment of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Brandy DavisDepartment of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Patricia R WigleDivision of Pharmacy Practice & Administrative Sciences, The James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Ana L HincapieDivision of Pharmacy Practice & Administrative Sciences, The James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Jeff Jianfei GuoDivision of Pharmacy Practice & Administrative Sciences, The James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · USAuburn University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There have been numerous cases of adverse events since the introduction of Essure medical devices for sterilization in 2002. This study analyzed the safety event reports of the Essure reported in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE). Methods: A retrospective analysis examined the MAUDE reports between Jan-1, 2018, and Oct-31, 2018 and focused on safety reports related to the Essure device. Safety reports were categorized and analyzed by their event type, device problem, patients' symptoms and the level of harm. Of this study cohort, 10% of samples were randomly selected for quantitative analyses. Thematic analysis was conducted for reports included death cases. Results: A total of 4,994 eligible reports were analyzed. There were ten reports associated with individuals' deaths, and the main themes of safety reports from qualitative analysis were pains, bleeding, surgery, migraine, and infection. Quantitative analysis of 500 randomly selected samples showed that 98% of adverse event reports were associated with different injuries such as surgery, pain, bleeding, hysterectomy, and menorrhagia. Additionally, more than 90% of reports were submitted by the manufacturer. Conclusion: These findings indicated several safety issues of Essure. More meaningful pre- and post-marketing surveillance and regulation are warranted in the medical device market to ensure safety and effectiveness, including investigating complaints, promptly sharing relevant information with regulators and users, and implementing corrective actions.

Indexed as

adverse event reportingdevice safetyEssuremaudesurveillance

Identifiers

PMID37519343
PMCPMC10374426
OpenAlexW4384299369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.