Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37519237›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2024

Penn Healthy Diet survey: pilot validation and scoring.

Charlene W Compher, Ryan Quinn, Richard Haslam, Elizabeth Bader, Joellen Weaver, Scott Dudek, Marylyn D Ritchie, James D Lewis, Gary D Wu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06142903 (THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF 7 VERSUS 21 HOME-DELIVERED MEDICALLY TAILORED MEALS TO IMPROVE MALNUTRITION RISK IN MALNOURISHED PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06142903 nacompletednot on this map

The comparative effectiveness of 7 versus 21 home-delivered medically tailored meals to improve malnutrition risk in malnourished patients with heart failure: a random order crossover feeding trial (medimeals)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled46ConditionsHeart Failure, MalnutritionArms7 versus 21 medically tailored meals per week
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charlene W CompherUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8117-5387
Ryan QuinnUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Department of Biostatistics, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Richard HaslamUniversity of Dublin, School of Medicine, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Elizabeth BaderUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Joellen WeaverUniversity of Pennsylvania Health System, Penn Medicine Biobank, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Scott DudekDepartment of Genetics and Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Marylyn D RitchieDepartment of Genetics and Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
James D Lewis *University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gary D Wu *University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Phenotypic Diversity in COVID-19UL1TR001878 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2016 to 2025
$102.4M
TRANSGENIC AND CHIMERIC MOUSE COREP30DK050306 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REBECCA G WELLS · 1997 to 2026
$32.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001878NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK050306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though diet quality is widely recognised as linked to risk of chronic disease, health systems have been challenged to find a user-friendly, efficient way to obtain information about diet. The Penn Healthy Diet (PHD) survey was designed to fill this void. The purposes of this pilot project were to assess the patient experience with the PHD, to validate the accuracy of the PHD against related items in a diet recall and to explore scoring algorithms with relationship to the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015 computed from the recall data. A convenience sample of participants in the Penn Health BioBank was surveyed with the PHD, the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour recall (ASA24) and experience questions. Kappa scores and Spearman correlations were used to compare related questions in the PHD to the ASA24. Numerical scoring, regression tree and weighted regressions were computed for scoring. Participants assessed the PHD as easy to use and were willing to repeat the survey at least annually. The three scoring algorithms were strongly associated with HEI-2015 scores using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-2018 data from which the PHD was developed and moderately associated with the pilot replication data. The PHD is acceptable to participants and at least moderately correlated with the HEI-2015. Further validation in a larger sample will enable the selection of the strongest scoring approach.

Indexed as

DietDiet, HealthyDiet SurveysHumansNutrition SurveysPilot ProjectsASA24BiobankDietHEI-2015NHANESScoreScreenerSurvey

Identifiers

PMID37519237
PMCPMC13032182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.