Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37519137›Full record

ArticleActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2023

Artificial intelligence for the recognition of benign lesions of vocal folds from audio recordings.

Maria Raffaella Marchese, Federico Sensoli, Silvia Campagnini, Matteo Cianchetti, Andrea Nacci, Francesco Ursino, Lucia D'Alatri, Jacopo Galli, Maria Chiara Carrozza, Gaetano Paludetti and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Raffaella MarcheseUnità Operativa Complessa di Otorinolaringoiatria, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Organi di Senso e Torace, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Federico SensoliInstitute of Biorobotics, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Silvia CampagniniInstitute of Biorobotics, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Matteo CianchettiInstitute of Biorobotics, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Andrea NacciU.O. Otorinolaringoiatria Audiologia e Foniatria, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Francesco UrsinoIstituto Nazionale di Ricerche in Foniatria "G. Bartalena", Pisa, Italy.
Lucia D'AlatriUnità Operativa Complessa di Otorinolaringoiatria, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Organi di Senso e Torace, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Jacopo GalliUnità Operativa Complessa di Otorinolaringoiatria, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Organi di Senso e Torace, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Maria Chiara CarrozzaInstitute of Biorobotics, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Gaetano PaludettiUnità Operativa Complessa di Otorinolaringoiatria, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Organi di Senso e Torace, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Andrea ManniniInstitute of Biorobotics, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITDon Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The diagnosis of benign lesions of the vocal fold (BLVF) is still challenging. The analysis of the acoustic signals through the implementation of machine learning models can be a viable solution aimed at offering support for clinical diagnosis. Materials and methods: In this study, a support vector machine was trained and cross-validated (10-fold cross-validation) using 138 features extracted from the acoustic signals of 418 patients with polyps, nodules, oedema, and cysts. The model's performance was presented as accuracy and average F1-score. The results were also analysed in male (M) and female (F) subgroups. Results: The validation accuracy was 55%, 80%, and 54% on the overall cohort, and in M and F, respectively. Better performances were observed in the detection of cysts and nodules (58% and 62%, respectively) vs polyps and oedema (47% and 53%, respectively). The results on each lesion and the different patterns of the model on M and F are in line with clinical observations, obtaining better results on F and detection of sensitive polyps in M. Conclusions: This study showed moderately accurate detection of four types of BLVF using acoustic signals. The analysis of the diagnostic results on gender subgroups highlights different behaviours of the diagnostic model.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedLaryngeal NeoplasmsPredictive Learning ModelsSpeech Recognition SoftwareVocal Cord DysfunctionAdultAgedArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSoftware ValidationSound RecordingsSpeech Acousticsartificial intelligencebenign lesions of vocal foldsdysphoniamachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37519137
PMCPMC10551729
OpenAlexW4385406861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.