Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37519001›Full record

SynthesisCurrent neuropharmacology2023

Cognitive Effects of Lurasidone and Cariprazine: A Mini Systematic Review.

Miriam Olivola, Nicola Bassetti, Serena Parente, Vincenzo Arienti, Serena Chiara Civardi, Pietro Alessandro Topa, Natascia Brondino

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current neuropharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Sigma-1-targeting multimodal compound HBK-15 reverses memory deficits and restores hippocampal plasticity under NMDA hypofunction.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cariprazine in Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Therapeutic Potential.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miriam OlivolaDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, Università di Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy.
Nicola BassettiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, Università di Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy.
Serena ParenteDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, Università di Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy.
Vincenzo ArientiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, Università di Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy.
Serena Chiara CivardiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, Università di Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy.
Pietro Alessandro TopaDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, Università di Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy.
Natascia BrondinoDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, Università di Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy.
University of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive deficits are associated with schizophrenia and show a progressive worsening, often being unresponsive to treatment. New antipsychotic molecules acting as antagonist at the serotoninergic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 7 (e.g. lurasidone) or partial agonists at dopamine D3 receptor (e.g. cariprazine) could have an impact on cognition in this patient group. The aim of the systematic review is to explore the efficacy of lurasidone and cariprazine in improving cognition in both animal models and human studies. The following terms: (lurasidone AND cognit*) OR (cariprazine AND cognit*) were searched in Web of Science from inception to December 2021. We included all studies that assessed changes in cognitive function after treatment with cariprazine or lurasidone. Of 201 selected articles, 36 were included. Twenty-four articles used animal models (rats, mice and marmosets), five evaluating the effects of cariprazine and 19 the effects of lurasidone. Twelve articles were clinical studies (cariprazine n = 2; lurasidone n = 10). In both animal and human studies lurasidone showed a greater efficacy on cognitive performance compared to placebo, quetiapine, ziprasidone or treatmentas- usual. Cariprazine was superior to other antipsychotics in improving cognitive functions in both animal and human studies. The cognitive effect of lurasidone could be explained by its potent antagonism at the 5-HT7 receptors combined with partial agonism at 5-HT1A receptors. The pro-cognitive effect of cariprazine is probably explained by its very high affinity for D3 receptors. Head-to-head studies comparing lurasidone and cariprazine are needed to establish the "first-choice" treatment for cognitive dysfunction associated with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsSchizophreniaAnimalsCognitionHumansLurasidone HydrochlorideMicePiperazinesRatsAntipsychotic AgentscariprazineLurasidone HydrochloridePiperazines5HT7affective disorderAntipsychoticscariprazinecognitionD3lurasidonepsychosis

Identifiers

PMID37519001
PMCPMC10616918
OpenAlexW4385405980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.