Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37519000›Full record

SynthesisCurrent neuropharmacology2023

Nabiximols is Efficient as Add-On Treatment for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Refractory to Standard Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials.

Dénes Kleiner, István László Horváth, Stefania Bunduc, Dorottya Gergő, Katalin Lugosi, Péter Fehérvári, Péter Hegyi, Dezső Csupor

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current neuropharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cannabinoids in rehabilitation medicine: From controversy to clinical potential.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dénes KleinerUniversity Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Administration, Semmelweis University, Hőgyes Endre utca 7-9., 1092 Budapest, Hungary.
István László HorváthUniversity Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Administration, Semmelweis University, Hőgyes Endre utca 7-9., 1092 Budapest, Hungary.
Stefania BunducCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Dorottya GergőCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Katalin LugosiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter FehérváriCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Dezső CsuporCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUInstitutul Clinic Fundeni · ROUniversity of Szeged · HUUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpasticity affects 54% of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients at disease onset, but this rate gradually increases with disease progression. Spasticity does not fully respond to standard treatment in one-third of the patients.

objectiveOur systematic review and meta-analysis assessed whether add-on nabiximols, can improve MS-associated refractory spasticity.

methodsThe systematic literature search was performed in Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Embase, on 15/10/2021, without restrictions. We included in the review blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of nabiximols in adult MS patients with refractory spasticity, by comparison with placebo. The primary outcome was responder rate by spasticity numerical rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were spasticity-related parameters. We used random effect models to calculate odds ratios (OR) or mean differences and the corresponding 95% CI. Bias-factors were assessed with Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2). (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021282177).

resultsWe identified 9 eligible articles, of which 7 (1128 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The spasticity numerical rating scale (NRS) was significantly higher in the nabiximols group than in the placebo group (OR 2.41 (95% CI 1.39; 4.18)). Secondary outcomes were in accordance with our primary results. At least some concerns were detected in the risk of bias analysis.

conclusionOur results indicate that nabiximols is efficient in MS associated spasticity, refractory to standard treatment and it may be considered as add-on symptomatic therapy. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment protocol - dose, duration, moment of initiation, disease type.

Indexed as

CannabidiolMultiple SclerosisAdultDronabinolDrug CombinationsHumansMuscle SpasticityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeCannabidiolDronabinolDrug Combinationsnabiximolsmeta-analysismultiple sclerosisNabiximolsresistant spasticitySativexspasticity numerical rating scalesystematic reviewTHC/CBD

Identifiers

PMID37519000
PMCPMC10616923
OpenAlexW4385406505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.