Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37518978›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023

Early Lactate/Albumin and Procalcitonin/Albumin Ratios as Predictors of 28-Day Mortality in ICU-Admitted Sepsis Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Fuxing Li, Zhiqiang Ye, Junqi Zhu, Shumin Gu, Suqin Peng, Youling Fang, Longhua Hu, Jianqiu Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Prioritized factors of severity prognosis in patients admitted for sepsis or septic shock in a resource-limited region of central Vietnam.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fuxing LiDepartment of Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Medicine, Clinical Laboratory of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Zhiqiang YeDepartment of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Junqi ZhuDepartment of Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Medicine, Clinical Laboratory of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Shumin GuDepartment of Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Medicine, Clinical Laboratory of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Suqin PengDepartment of Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Medicine, Clinical Laboratory of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Youling FangDepartment of Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Medicine, Clinical Laboratory of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Longhua HuDepartment of Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Medicine, Clinical Laboratory of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).
Jianqiu XiongDepartment of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Lactate/albumin (LA/ALB) and procalcitonin/albumin (PCT/ALB) ratios have been implicated in predicting mortality in sepsis patients. However, their prognostic value and relationship to sepsis severity require further investigation. This retrospective study aimed to assess the prognostic value of lactate/albumin (LA/ALB) and procalcitonin/albumin (PCT/ALB) ratios in septic patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 340 adult sepsis patients admitted to the ICU were included in the derivation cohort. LA/ALB and PCT/ALB ratios were calculated and analyzed in relation to sepsis severity and survival status. Additionally, a validation cohort of 75 sepsis patients from another medical center was selected. RESULTS In the derivation cohort, higher LA/ALB and PCT/ALB ratios and SOFA scores were significantly associated with increased mortality (P<0.001). The LA/ALB and PCT/ALB ratios positively correlated with SOFA score. Survival analysis revealed significantly higher 28-day mortality in sepsis patients with elevated PCT/ALB (≥0.256) and LA/ALB (≥0.079) ratios upon ICU admission. The constructed prediction model incorporating LA/ALB ratio, PCT/ALB ratio, and SOFA score yielded an AUC of 0.826, demonstrating good predictive ability. The associations between LA/ALB and PCT/ALB ratios and 28-day mortality in sepsis patients were validated in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS The LA/ALB and PCT/ALB ratios at ICU admission provide valuable prognostic information for predicting 28-day mortality in sepsis patients. Combining these ratios with SOFA score improves the assessment of prognosis in sepsis patients.

Indexed as

ProcalcitoninSepsisAdultAlbuminsHumansIntensive Care UnitsLactic AcidOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveAlbuminsLactic AcidProcalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID37518978
PMCPMC10402292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.