ArticleBMJ open2023
Effectiveness of Specific Health Check-ups in Japan for the primary prevention of obesity-related diseases: a protocol for a target trial emulation.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- One-Year Trajectory of Step Counts and Weight Loss in Adults With Overweight/Obesity: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Global burden and risk factors of MASLD: trends from 1990 to 2021 and predictions to 2030.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Temporal trends in cancer mortality attributable to high BMI in Asia: an age-period-cohort analysis based on GBD 1992-2021.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Universal Health Checkups and Risk of Incident Diabetes and Hypertension.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Long-term evacuation and obesity: a 12-year follow-up comparative study of residents inside and outside Katsurao Village after the Fukushima nuclear disaster.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionConcerns about public health threats have shifted towards obesity-related, non-communicable diseases in both developed and developing countries. Since 2008, Japan has adopted a nationwide universal screening programme called Specific Health check-ups (SHC) for the primary prevention of obesity-related, non-communicable diseases, namely, diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. The effectiveness of SHC has not been systemically evaluated to date. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use the employment-based health insurance database, which includes both records of receipt versus non-receipt of SHC and healthcare claims. The study design adopts the target trial emulation framework to minimise the bias inherent to the observational study (eg, time-related bias and its consequences). The key components of trial emulation-eligibility criteria, treatment strategy, assignment procedure, follow-up period, outcome, causal contrast of interest and analysis plan-are detailed, along with the ideal target trial protocol. Briefly, we will conduct the nested-trial emulation approach that allows multiple trial entries. Persons aged 40-74 years will be eligible if they do not have a documented diagnosis of hypertension and diabetes and a history of receiving SHC at baseline. Participants will be classified according to the receipt or non-receipt of SHC service and followed for a maximum of 10 years until the withdrawal from the insurance plan, the outcome occurrence or the administrative censoring (the end of the available data, expected to be March 2022), whichever comes first. The 10-year incidence of diabetes/hypertension will be compared between SHC recipients and non-recipients using pooled logistic regression with adjustments for baseline confounders. Five sensitivity analyses are employed, including per-protocol analysis, changing eligibility criteria and negative outcome control analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol obtained the approval from Kyoto University Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine, Ethics Committee (R2448). The findings will be disseminated to academic conferences, and published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.