Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37518078›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

RECREATE: a study protocol for a multicentre pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) in UK stroke services evaluating an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in stroke survivors (Get Set Go) with embedded process and economic evaluations.

Jennifer Airlie, Louisa-Jane Burton, Bethan Copsey, Coralie English, Amanda Farrin, Claire F Fitzsimons, Ivana Holloway, Judith Horrocks, Jessica Faye Johansson, Gillian Mead and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jennifer AirlieAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK jennifer.airlie@bthft.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7505-3049
Louisa-Jane BurtonAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3617-1410
Bethan CopseyLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9783-6549
Coralie EnglishSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5910-7927
Amanda FarrinLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2876-0584
Claire F FitzsimonsPhysical Activity for Health and Research Centre, Institute for Sport Physical Education and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6192-1397
Ivana HollowayInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9542-883X
Judith HorrocksLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Jessica Faye JohanssonAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3622-9598
Gillian MeadCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7494-2023
Lauren A MoreauLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0280-6345
Seline OzerAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5791-5469
Anita PatelAnita Patel Health Economics Consulting Ltd, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0769-1732
Nahel YazijiInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2273-7957
Anne ForsterAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7466-4414
RECREATE Programme Management Group
University of Leeds · GBBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBHunter Medical Research Institute · AUKing's College London · GBUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSedentary behaviour (sitting or lying during waking hours without being otherwise active) is strongly associated with adverse health outcomes, including all-cause, cancer and cardiovascular mortality in adults. Stroke survivors are consistently reported as being more sedentary than healthy age-matched controls, spending more hours sedentary daily and sustaining longer unbroken bouts of sedentary time. An evidence-based and clinically feasible intervention ('Get Set Go') was developed. A pragmatic definitive trial to evaluate Get Set Go was planned; however, due to the unprecedented effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on National Health Service (NHS) services this study was reduced in size and scope to become an external pilot trial. We report the protocol for this external pilot trial, which aims to undertake a preliminary exploration of whether Get Set Go is likely to improve ability to complete extended activities of daily living in the first year post-stroke and inform future trial designs in stroke rehabilitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a pragmatic, multicentre, two-arm, external pilot cluster randomised controlled trial with embedded process and economic evaluations. UK-based stroke services will be randomised 1:1 to the intervention (usual care plus Get Set Go) or control (usual care) arm. Fifteen stroke services will recruit 300-400 stroke inpatient and carer participants, with follow-up at 6, 12 and 24 months. The proposed primary endpoint is stroke survivor self-reported Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living scale at 12 months. Endpoint analyses will be exploratory and provide preliminary estimates of intervention effect. The process evaluation will provide valuable information on intervention fidelity, acceptability and how it can be optimised. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by Yorkshire and The Humber - Bradford-Leeds Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 19/YH/0403). Results will be disseminated through journal publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial was registered prospectively on 01 April 2020 (ISRCTN ref: ISRCTN82280581).

Indexed as

COVID-19StrokeActivities of Daily LivingAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPandemicsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSedentary BehaviorState MedicineSurvivorsUnited Kingdomclinical trialrehabilitation medicinestroke

Identifiers

PMID37518078
PMCPMC10387637
OpenAlexW4385406954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.