Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37517917›Full record

ArticleClinical therapeutics2023

Advancing Understanding of Inequities in Rare Disease Genomics.

Jillian G Serrano, Melanie O'Leary, Grace E VanNoy, Brian E Mangilog, Ingrid A Holm, Yarden S Fraiman, Heidi L Rehm, Anne O'Donnell-Luria, Monica H Wojcik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Equity-focused implementation to enhance access to rare disease genomic research and understand diverse perspectives.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Preclinical research (on rare diseases): we need to talk about health equity.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Assessment of the evidence yield for the calibrated PP3/BP4 computational recommendations.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jillian G SerranoBroad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Melanie O'LearyBroad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Grace E VanNoyBroad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Brian E MangilogBroad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Ingrid A HolmDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yarden S FraimanDivision of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Heidi L RehmBroad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Anne O'Donnell-LuriaBroad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Monica H WojcikBroad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: monica.wojcik@childrens.harvard.edu.

Funding

Broad Institute Mendelian Genomic Research CenterU01HG011755 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Anne O'Donnell-Luria, MICHAEL E TALKOWSKI · 2021 to 2026
$14.6M
Understanding Disparities in Genomic MedicineR21HG012397 · NHGRI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI O'DONNELL-LURIA, ANNE, WOJCIK, MONICA HSIUNG · 2022 to 2023
$487k
NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG012397NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG011755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdvances in genomic research have facilitated rare disease diagnosis for thousands of individuals. Unfortunately, the benefits of advanced genetic diagnostic technology are not distributed equitably among the population, as has been seen in many other health care contexts. Quantifying and describing inequities in genetic diagnostic yield is inherently challenging due to barriers to both clinical and research genetic testing. We therefore present an implementation protocol developed to expand access to our rare disease genomic research study and to further understand existing inequities. METHODS AND

findingsThe Rare Genomes Project (RGP) at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard offers research genome sequencing to individuals with rare disease who remain genetically undiagnosed through direct interaction with the individual or family. This presents an opportunity for diagnosis beyond the clinical context, thus eliminating many barriers to access. An initial goal of RGP was to equalize access to genomic sequencing by decoupling testing access from proximity to a major medical center and physician referral. However, study participants over the initial 3 years of this project were predominantly white and well resourced. To further understand and address the lack of diversity within RGP, we developed a novel protocol embedded within the larger RGP study, in an approach informed by an implementation science framework. The aims of this protocol were: (1) to diversify recruitment and enrollment within RGP; (2) understand the process and context of implementing genomic medicine for rare disease diagnosis; and (3) investigate the value of a diagnosis for underserved populations. IMPLICATIONS: Improved understanding of existing inequities and potential strategies to address them are needed to advance equity in rare disease genetic diagnosis and research. In addition to the moral imperative of equity in genomic medicine, this approach is critical in order to fully understand the genomic underpinnings of rare disease.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingRare DiseasesDelivery of Health CareGenomicsHumansDisparitiesGeneticsGenomicsImplementationInequitiesRare disease

Identifiers

PMID37517917
PMCPMC10527807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.