ArticleClinical therapeutics2023
Advancing Understanding of Inequities in Rare Disease Genomics.
Article in Clinical therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic pathways in developmental disorders: a decade-apart comparison of two multicenter cohorts (2012-2022).European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Caring for Rare Genetic Disease: A Vision for the Future.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Calibration of in-frame indel variant effect predictors for clinical variant classification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Equity-focused implementation to enhance access to rare disease genomic research and understand diverse perspectives.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Article
- GREGoR: accelerating genomics for rare diseases.Nature · 2025Article
- Frequency and Spectrum of Actionable Secondary Findings in the Maltese Population.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Preclinical research (on rare diseases): we need to talk about health equity.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025Review
- Enhancing diagnostic capability with multi-agents conversational large language models.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Universal newborn screening using genome sequencing: early experience from the GUARDIAN study.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Breaking barriers: fostering equitable access to pediatric genomics through innovative care models and technologies.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- GREGoR: Accelerating Genomics for Rare Diseases.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Assessment of the evidence yield for the calibrated PP3/BP4 computational recommendations.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024Article
- Critical assessment of variant prioritization methods for rare disease diagnosis within the rare genomes project.Human genomics · 2024Article
- Assessment of the evidence yield for the calibrated PP3/BP4 computational recommendations.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Novel hemizygous single-nucleotide duplication in RPGR in a patient with retinal dystrophy and sensorineural hearing loss.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Critical assessment of variant prioritization methods for rare disease diagnosis within the Rare Genomes Project.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- ACCESS: an empirically-based framework developed by the International Nursing CASCADE Consortium to address genomic disparities through the nursing workforce.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAdvances in genomic research have facilitated rare disease diagnosis for thousands of individuals. Unfortunately, the benefits of advanced genetic diagnostic technology are not distributed equitably among the population, as has been seen in many other health care contexts. Quantifying and describing inequities in genetic diagnostic yield is inherently challenging due to barriers to both clinical and research genetic testing. We therefore present an implementation protocol developed to expand access to our rare disease genomic research study and to further understand existing inequities. METHODS AND
findingsThe Rare Genomes Project (RGP) at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard offers research genome sequencing to individuals with rare disease who remain genetically undiagnosed through direct interaction with the individual or family. This presents an opportunity for diagnosis beyond the clinical context, thus eliminating many barriers to access. An initial goal of RGP was to equalize access to genomic sequencing by decoupling testing access from proximity to a major medical center and physician referral. However, study participants over the initial 3 years of this project were predominantly white and well resourced. To further understand and address the lack of diversity within RGP, we developed a novel protocol embedded within the larger RGP study, in an approach informed by an implementation science framework. The aims of this protocol were: (1) to diversify recruitment and enrollment within RGP; (2) understand the process and context of implementing genomic medicine for rare disease diagnosis; and (3) investigate the value of a diagnosis for underserved populations. IMPLICATIONS: Improved understanding of existing inequities and potential strategies to address them are needed to advance equity in rare disease genetic diagnosis and research. In addition to the moral imperative of equity in genomic medicine, this approach is critical in order to fully understand the genomic underpinnings of rare disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.