Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37517126›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of cardiology2023

Aggregate Clinical and Biomarker-Based Model Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

Shivang R Desai, Devinder S Dhindsa, Yi-An Ko, Pratik B Sandesara, Anurag Mehta, Chang Liu, Ayman S Tahhan, Salim S Hayek, Kiran Ejaz, Ananya Hooda and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shivang R DesaiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Devinder S DhindsaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Yi-An KoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Pratik B SandesaraDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Anurag MehtaDepartment of Preventive Cardiology, VCU Health Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
Chang LiuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ayman S TahhanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Salim S HayekDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kiran EjazDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ananya HoodaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ayman AlkhoderDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Shabatun J IslamDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Steven C RogersDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Agim BeshiriDiagnostics Division, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Illinois.
Gillian MurtaghDiagnostics Division, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Illinois.
Jonathan H KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Peter WilsonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Zakaria AlmuwaqqatDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Laurence S SperlingDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Arshed A QuyyumiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: aquyyum@emory.edu.
Emory University · USAbbott (United States) · USMichigan Medicine · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Serious Hazards of Transfusion & Cellular Therapies: Mechanisms and InterventionP01HL086773 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ROBACK, JOHN D · 2008 to 2019
$17.9M
Translational Research Core - Engagement and Behavior ChangeP30DK111024 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Mohammed Kumail Ali · 2016 to 2026
$13.4M
Neuro HPA Project 1U54AG062334 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ighovwerha Ofotokun · 2018 to 2026
$12.2M
Vascular Responses During Mental StressP01HL101398 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI QUYYUMI, ARSHED A · 2010 to 2015
$11.0M
Multidisciplinary Research Training to Reduce Inequities in Cardiovascular HealthT32HL130025 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Tené T Lewis, Viola Vaccarino · 2016 to 2026
$6.4M
The role of the renin-angiotensin-endothelial pathway in ADRF1AG051633 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HAJJAR, IHAB M, QUYYUMI, ARSHED A · 2015 to 2017
$6.0M
Metabolomics of subclinical and clinical cardiovascular diseaseP20HL113451 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, DEAN PAUL · 2012 to 2016
$4.3M
Microvascular and sensory nerve function in non-Hispanic Blacks and WhitesR01HL141205 · NHLBI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, BRETT · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulated Factor (GM-CSF) in Peripheral Arterial DiseaseR61HL138657 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI QUYYUMI, ARSHED A · 2017 to 2017
$775k
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL086773NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL101398NHLBI NIH HHS P20 HL113451NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141205NHLBI NIH HHS R61 HL138657NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL130025NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG051633NIA NIH HHS U54 AG062334NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK111024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite guideline-based therapy, patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are at widely variable risk for cardiovascular events. This variability demands a more individualized risk assessment. Herein, we evaluate the prognostic value of 6 biomarkers: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, heat shock protein-70, fibrin degradation products, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, high-sensitivity troponin I, and B-type natriuretic peptide. We then develop a multi-biomarker-based cardiovascular event prediction model for patients with stable CAD. In total, 3,115 subjects with stable CAD who underwent cardiac catheterization at Emory (mean age 62.8 years, 17% Black, 35% female, 57% obstructive CAD, 31% diabetes mellitus) were randomized into a training cohort to identify biomarker cutoff values and a validation cohort for prediction assessment. Main outcomes included (1) all-cause death and (2) a composite of cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) within 5 years. Elevation of each biomarker level was associated with higher event rates in the training cohort. A biomarker risk score was created using optimal cutoffs, ranging from 0 to 6 for each biomarker exceeding its cutoff. In the validation cohort, each unit increase in the biomarker risk score was independently associated with all-cause death (hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45 to 1.80) and cardiovascular death/MI (hazard ratio 1.52, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.71). A biomarker risk prediction model for cardiovascular death/MI improved the c-statistic (∆ 6.4%, 95% CI 3.9 to 8.8) and net reclassification index by 31.1% (95% CI 24 to 37), compared with clinical risk factors alone. Integrating multiple biomarkers with clinical variables refines cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with CAD.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial InfarctionBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37517126
PMCPMC10900119
OpenAlexW4385371268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.