ArticleMedical physics2023
Correcting statistical CT number biases without access to raw detector counts: Applications to high spatial resolution photon counting CT imaging.
Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDue to the nonlinear nature of the logarithmic operation and the stochastic nature of photon counts (N), sinogram data of photon counting detector CT (PCD-CT) are intrinsically biased, which leads to statistical CT number biases. When raw counts are available, nearly unbiased statistical estimators for projection data were developed recently to address the CT number bias issue. However, for most clinical PCD-CT systems, users' access to raw detector counts is limited. Therefore, it remains a challenge for end users to address the CT number bias issue in clinical applications. PURPOSE: To develop methods to correct statistical biases in PCD-CT without requiring access to raw PCD counts.
methods(1) The sample variance of air-only post-log sinograms was used to estimate air-only detector counts,
resultsExperimental results demonstrated that both sinogram domain- and image domain-based bias correction methods enabled reduced-dose PCD-CT images to match the CT numbers of reference-standard images within [-5, 5] HU. In contrast, uncorrected reduced-dose PCD-CT images demonstrated biases ranging from -25 to 55 HU, depending on the material. No increase in image noise or spatial resolution degradation was observed using the proposed methods.
conclusionsCT number bias issues can be effectively addressed using the proposed sinogram or image domain method in PCD-CT, allowing PCD-CT acquired at different radiation dose levels to have consistent CT numbers desired for quantitative imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.