Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37516986›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Lateral meniscus posterior root repair in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores joint mechanics to the intact state and improves clinical function: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes.

Allison K Perry, Derrick M Knapik, Bhargavi Maheshwer, Evan M Polce, Alexander J Hodakowski, Garrett Jackson, Safa Gursoy, Jorge Chahla

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Long-Term Results for Meniscus Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Allison K PerryDivision of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, 1611 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. akperry13@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7555-2131
Derrick M KnapikDivision of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, 1611 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Bhargavi MaheshwerUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA.
Evan M PolceSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
Alexander J HodakowskiDivision of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, 1611 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Garrett JacksonDivision of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, 1611 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Safa GursoyDivision of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, 1611 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Jorge ChahlaDivision of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, 1611 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. jorge.chahla@rushortho.com.
Rush University · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo perform a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes following lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

methodsA literature search was performed systematically using PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases in April 2022. The search included the following terms combined with Boolean operators: 'Meniscus repairs', 'Meniscal Repair', 'Posterior Horn', 'Root', 'Radial'. Inclusion criteria consisted of level I-IV human clinical and biomechanical studies reporting biomechanical data and/or outcomes following LMPR repair in the setting of ACLR.

resultsThree biomechanical studies, all utilizing a transtibial pullout technique, were identified, all of which reported significant improvement in joint contact pressures and mechanics and 3/4 of which reported significant improvement in anterior or rotational stability with LMPR repair. Five clinical studies, consisting of 146 patients (mean age 28.5 ± 1.1 years) undergoing LMPR repair, were identified with an average follow-up of 19.1 months (range 6.2-46 months). Across all clinical studies, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were found to improve postoperatively, with 3/4 reporting significant improvement in Lysholm (all, p ≤ 0.001) scores and 3/5 reporting significant improvement in IKDC scores when compared to preoperative values (all, p ≥ 0.004). Meniscal extrusion decreased significantly following repair in 2/4 studies (all, p ≤ 0.001).

conclusionsBiomechanically, transtibial pullout repair of the LMPR restored joint contact pressures and joint mechanics to intact levels when performed with concomitant ACLR. Clinically, LMPR repair with concurrent ACLR resulted in improved Lysholm and IKDC scores. These findings enable surgeons to determine optimal treatment plans and discuss realistic outcomes with patients when encountering LMPR injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeChild, PreschoolHumansInfantKnee JointMenisci, TibialACLKneeMeniscus

Identifiers

PMID37516986
OpenAlexW4385392387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.