ArticleHuman brain mapping2023
An automated pipeline for obtaining labeled ICA-templates corresponding to functional brain systems.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local and global effects of sedation in resting-state fMRI: a randomized, placebo-controlled comparison between etifoxine and alprazolam.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Trial
- The Default Mode Network and Behavior: a Model to Analyse Psycho-Physiological Interactions in Resting State fMRI.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Neural Networks and Chemical Messengers: Insights into Tobacco Addiction.Brain topography · 2025Article
- Domain-Specific Prediction of Clinical Progression in Parkinson's Disease Using the Mosaic Approach.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- An automated pipeline for obtaining labeled ICA-templates corresponding to functional brain systems.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complexity of our actions and thinking is likely reflected in functional brain networks. Independent component analysis (ICA) is a popular data-driven method to compute group differences between such networks. A common way to investigate network differences is based on ICA maps which are generated from study-specific samples. However, this approach limits the generalizability and reproducibility of the results. Alternatively, network ICA templates can be used, but up to date, few such templates exist and are limited in terms of the functional systems they cover. Here, we propose a simple two-step procedure to obtain ICA-templates corresponding to functional brain systems of the researcher's choice: In step 1, the functional system of interest needs to be defined by means of a statistical parameter map (input), which one can generate with open-source software such as NeuroSynth or BrainMap. In step 2, that map is correlated to group-ICA maps provided by the Human Connectome Project (HCP), which is based on a large sample size and uses high quality and standardized acquisition procedures. The HCP-provided ICA-map with the highest correlation to the input map is then used as an ICA template representing the functional system of interest, for example, for subsequent analyses such as dual regression. We provide a toolbox to complete step 2 of the suggested procedure and demonstrate the usage of our pipeline by producing an ICA templates that corresponds to "motor function" and nine additional brain functional systems resulting in an ICA maps with excellent alignment with the gray matter/white matter boundaries of the brain. Our toolbox generates data in two different file formats: volumetric-based (NIFTI) and combined surface/volumetric files (CIFTI). Compared to 10 existing templates, our procedure output component maps with systematically stronger contribution of gray matter to the ICA z-values compared to white matter voxels in 9/10 cases by at least a factor of 2. The toolbox allows users to investigate functional networks of interest, which will enhance interpretability, reproducibility, and standardization of research investigating functional brain networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.