Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37516906›Full record

ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023

Enhancing Bone Grafting Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review of Antibacterial Artificial Composite Bone Scaffolds.

Yi Liu, Liuxing He, Lijia Cheng, Xinsong Li, Min Gao, Qinzhi Li, Jingjing Gao, Murugan Ramalingam

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Advances in Biomimetic Scaffolds for Hard Tissue Surgery.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi LiuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Liuxing HeSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Lijia ChengSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Xinsong LiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Min GaoSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Qinzhi LiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Jingjing GaoSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Murugan RamalingamSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Chengdu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defects and dysfunctions are prevalent among patients, resulting from various causes such as trauma, tumors, congenital malformations, inflammation, and infection. The demand for bone defect repair materials is second only to blood transfusions. Artificial bone composites offer numerous advantages for bone damage repair, including their availability, absence of rejection or immune reactions, high malleability, exceptional mechanical strength, and outstanding biocompatibility. However, bacterial infections frequently occur during bone transplantation or on graft material structures, leading to severe complications such as osteomyelitis and osteoporosis. Moreover, existing osteogenic materials alone are inadequate to address the challenges posed by traumatic infections, presenting a significant hurdle for clinicians in reconstructing infectious bone defects. Consequently, it is crucial to functionalize artificial bone composites to facilitate effective bone repair and regeneration. Notably, antibacterial capabilities play a critical role in preventing and treating infectious bone defects, and current research is focusing on the interface between artificial bone composites and antibacterial treatments. This article provides an extensive review of the current state of artificial composite bone scaffolds with antibacterial properties for infection prevention in bone grafting.

Indexed as

ArthrodesisBone TransplantationAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansInflammationOsteogenesisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID37516906
PMCPMC10399463
OpenAlexW4382400896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.