ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023
Enhancing Bone Grafting Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review of Antibacterial Artificial Composite Bone Scaffolds.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- PCL/Chitosan/Bioglass Hybrid Composite Shape Memory Scaffolds With Accelerated Degradation and Enhanced Bioactivity.Macromolecular materials and engineering · 2026Article
- Synergistic integration of biomaterials in orthopedic implantation for infection preventing and tissue engineering.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Hoxc10-mediated 'positional memory' regulates cartilage formation subsequent to femoral heterotopic grafting.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Advances in Biomimetic Scaffolds for Hard Tissue Surgery.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impacts of stem cells from different sources on wound healing rate in diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone defects and dysfunctions are prevalent among patients, resulting from various causes such as trauma, tumors, congenital malformations, inflammation, and infection. The demand for bone defect repair materials is second only to blood transfusions. Artificial bone composites offer numerous advantages for bone damage repair, including their availability, absence of rejection or immune reactions, high malleability, exceptional mechanical strength, and outstanding biocompatibility. However, bacterial infections frequently occur during bone transplantation or on graft material structures, leading to severe complications such as osteomyelitis and osteoporosis. Moreover, existing osteogenic materials alone are inadequate to address the challenges posed by traumatic infections, presenting a significant hurdle for clinicians in reconstructing infectious bone defects. Consequently, it is crucial to functionalize artificial bone composites to facilitate effective bone repair and regeneration. Notably, antibacterial capabilities play a critical role in preventing and treating infectious bone defects, and current research is focusing on the interface between artificial bone composites and antibacterial treatments. This article provides an extensive review of the current state of artificial composite bone scaffolds with antibacterial properties for infection prevention in bone grafting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.