Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37516885›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2023

Clinical impact of the accelerate PhenoTest® BC system on patients with gram-negative bacteremia and high risk of antimicrobial resistance: a prospective before-after implementation study.

Tal Brosh-Nissimov, Anka Tzur, Daniel Grupel, Amos Cahan, Nir Ma'aravi, Maya Heled-Akiva, Hasan Jawamis, Hanna Leskes, Erez Barenboim, Nadav Sorek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. AI-Assisted Diagnosis ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Clinical impact of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing in patients with bacteremia due to gram-negative bacilli.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tal Brosh-NissimovSamson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Harefua st. 7, Ashdod, 7747629, Israel. tbrosh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7154-2032
Anka TzurSamson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Harefua st. 7, Ashdod, 7747629, Israel.
Daniel GrupelSamson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Harefua st. 7, Ashdod, 7747629, Israel.
Amos CahanSamson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Harefua st. 7, Ashdod, 7747629, Israel.
Nir Ma'araviSamson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Harefua st. 7, Ashdod, 7747629, Israel.
Maya Heled-AkivaSamson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Harefua st. 7, Ashdod, 7747629, Israel.
Hasan JawamisSamson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Harefua st. 7, Ashdod, 7747629, Israel.
Hanna LeskesSamson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Harefua st. 7, Ashdod, 7747629, Israel.
Erez BarenboimSamson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Harefua st. 7, Ashdod, 7747629, Israel.
Nadav SorekSamson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Harefua st. 7, Ashdod, 7747629, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Accelerate PhenoTest® BC system (AXDX) is a novel assay for rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility (AST). We report an evaluation of its impact on treatment of patients with Gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) with a high risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

methodsA prospective single-center evaluation before and after implementation of AXDX in addition to standard-of-care (SOC) microbiology and antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). Patients with GNB reported during laboratory working hours and prespecified risk factors for AMR were included. The primary outcome was an ASP-oriented beneficial antimicrobial change, defined as either an escalation of an inappropriate empiric treatment or de-escalation of a broad-spectrum treatment of a susceptible organism. Main secondary outcomes were time to an appropriate treatment, antimicrobial treatment duration, length of stay (LOS) and mortality.

resultsIncluded were 46 and 57 patients in the pre- and post-intervention periods, respectively. The median time to an AST-oriented beneficial change was 29.2 h vs. 49.6 h, respectively (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the time to appropriate treatment, LOS or mortality. Antimicrobial treatment duration was longer during the intervention period (10 vs. 8 days, p = 0.007). AXDX failed to correctly identify pathogens in all 6 cases of polymicrobial bacteremia. In two cases patient care was potentially compromised due to inappropriate de-escalation.

conclusionsAXDX implementation resulted in a 20.4-hour shorter time to an ASP-oriented beneficial antimicrobial change. This should be weighed against the higher costs, the lack of other proven clinical benefits and the potential harm from mis-identification of polymicrobial bacteremias.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansLaboratoriesProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic stewardshipAntimicrobial susceptibility testingAntimicrobial treatmentGram negative bacteremiaRapid ASTRapid identification

Identifiers

PMID37516885
PMCPMC10387206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.