ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2023
Mono-valent salt corrections for RNA secondary structures in the ViennaRNA package.
Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- gCoSRNA: Generalizable Coaxial Stacking Prediction for RNA Junctions Using Secondary Structure.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Article
- Oligonucleotide-Driven Nanoparticle Biosensor forACS omega · 2026Article
- NaBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Rapid, Economical Detection ofACS omega · 2025Article
- Molecular and Immunological Properties of a Chimeric Glycosyl Hydrolase 18 Based on Immunoinformatics Approaches: A Design of a New Anti-ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Prediction of Circular RNA Secondary Structures and Their Targets.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Limits of experimental evidence in RNA secondary structure prediction.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRNA features a highly negatively charged phosphate backbone that attracts a cloud of counter-ions that reduce the electrostatic repulsion in a concentration dependent manner. Ion concentrations thus have a large influence on folding and stability of RNA structures. Despite their well-documented effects, salt effects are not handled consistently by currently available secondary structure prediction algorithms. Combining Debye-Hückel potentials for line charges and Manning's counter-ion condensation theory, Einert et al. (Biophys J 100: 2745-2753, 2011) modeled the energetic contributions of monovalent cations on loops and helices.
resultsThe model of Einert et al. is adapted to match the structure of the dynamic programming recursion of RNA secondary structure prediction algorithms. An empirical term describing the salt dependence of the duplex initiation energy is added to improve co-folding predictions for two or more RNA strands. The slightly modified model is implemented in the ViennaRNA package in such way that only the energy parameters but not the algorithmic structure is affected. A comparison with data from the literature show that predicted free energies and melting temperatures are in reasonable agreement with experiments.
conclusionThe new feature in the ViennaRNA package makes it possible to study effects of salt concentrations on RNA folding in a systematic manner. Strictly speaking, the model pertains only to mono-valent cations, and thus covers the most important parameter, i.e., the NaCl concentration. It remains a question for future research to what extent unspecific effects of bi- and tri-valent cations can be approximated in a similar manner. AVAILABILITY: Corrections for the concentration of monovalent cations are available in the ViennaRNA package starting from version 2.6.0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.