ArticleClinical proteomics2023
Proteomic analysis identifies subgroups of patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus.
Article in Clinical proteomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Frailty phenotype, genetic risk and long-term incident systemic lupus erythematosus risk: Insights from the UK Biobank study integrated with multi-omics analysis.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Role of MZB1 in disease pathogenesis: current insights and future directions.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- XIST expression and hypermethylation of the X chromosome in males with systemic lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Integrative plasma proteomics and myeloid- interferon profiling reveal an AI-validated vascular- endothelial stress signature distinguishing SLE flare from remission in an Indian cohort a discovery - phase study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Research progress on the role of MZB1 in immune regulation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in systemic lupus erythematosus: integrating multi-omics data for precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Multi-omics and machine learning identify GBP2 as a key therapeutic target of Qingre Kasen granules in lupus nephritis via NF-kappaB modulation.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Data-Driven Cluster Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteome and Associations with Clinical Phenotypes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Article
- Prognostic biomarker discovery based on proteome landscape of Chinese lung adenocarcinoma.Clinical proteomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a clinically and biologically heterogenous autoimmune disease. We aimed to investigate the plasma proteome of patients with active SLE to identify novel subgroups, or endotypes, of patients.
methodPlasma was collected from patients with active SLE who were enrolled in the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Biologics Registry (BILAG-BR). The plasma proteome was analysed using a data-independent acquisition method, Sequential Window Acquisition of All theoretical mass spectra mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS). Unsupervised, data-driven clustering algorithms were used to delineate groups of patients with a shared proteomic profile.
resultsIn 223 patients, six clusters were identified based on quantification of 581 proteins. Between the clusters, there were significant differences in age (p = 0.012) and ethnicity (p = 0.003). There was increased musculoskeletal disease activity in cluster 1 (C1), 19/27 (70.4%) (p = 0.002) and renal activity in cluster 6 (C6) 15/24 (62.5%) (p = 0.051). Anti-SSa/Ro was the only autoantibody that significantly differed between clusters (p = 0.017). C1 was associated with p21-activated kinases (PAK) and Phospholipase C (PLC) signalling. Within C1 there were two sub-clusters (C1A and C1B) defined by 49 proteins related to cytoskeletal protein binding. C2 and C6 demonstrated opposite Rho family GTPase and Rho GDI signalling. Three proteins (MZB1, SND1 and AGL) identified in C6 increased the classification of active renal disease although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0617).
conclusionsUnsupervised proteomic analysis identifies clusters of patients with active SLE, that are associated with clinical and serological features, which may facilitate biomarker discovery. The observed proteomic heterogeneity further supports the need for a personalised approach to treatment in SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.