Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37516693›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

SAGES consensus recommendations on surgical video data use, structure, and exploration (for research in artificial intelligence, clinical quality improvement, and surgical education).

Jennifer A Eckhoff, Guy Rosman, Maria S Altieri, Stefanie Speidel, Danail Stoyanov, Mehran Anvari, Lena Meier-Hein, Keno März, Pierre Jannin, Carla Pugh and 10 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. GEN-Guard: correcting generalization failures for deployable federated surgical AI.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The ACPGBI AI taskforce report: A mixed-methods roadmap for AI in colorectal surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Consensus for Operating Room Multimodal Data Management: Identifying Research Priorities for Data-Driven Surgery.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Leveraging data science and AI to democratize global surgical expertise.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Could Artificial Intelligence guide surgeons' hands?Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jennifer A EckhoffSurgical Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, WAC339, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. jeckhoff@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0805-8050
Guy RosmanSurgical Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, WAC339, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Maria S AltieriStony Brook University Hospital, Washington University in St. Louis, 101 Nicolls Rd, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Stefanie SpeidelNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Fiedlerstraße 23, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Danail StoyanovUniversity College London, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TY, UK.
Mehran AnvariCenter for Surgical Invention and Innovation, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Lena Meier-HeinGerman Cancer Research Center, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Keno MärzGerman Cancer Research Center, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pierre JanninMediCIS, University of Rennes - Campus Beaulieu, 2 Av. du Professeur Léon Bernard, 35043, Rennes, France.
Carla PughDepartment of Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Martin WagnerDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Elan WitkowskiSurgical Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, WAC339, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Paresh ShawNew York University Langone, 530 1St Ave. Floor 12, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Amin MadaniSurgical Artifcial Intelligence Research Academy, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yutong BanSurgical Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, WAC339, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Thomas WardSurgical Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, WAC339, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Filippo FilicoriIntraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Nicolas PadoyIhu Strasbourg - Institute Surgery Guided Par L'image, 1 Pl. de L'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Mark TalaminiDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Ozanan R MeirelesSurgical Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, WAC339, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgery generates a vast amount of data from each procedure. Particularly video data provides significant value for surgical research, clinical outcome assessment, quality control, and education. The data lifecycle is influenced by various factors, including data structure, acquisition, storage, and sharing; data use and exploration, and finally data governance, which encompasses all ethical and legal regulations associated with the data. There is a universal need among stakeholders in surgical data science to establish standardized frameworks that address all aspects of this lifecycle to ensure data quality and purpose.

methodsWorking groups were formed, among 48 representatives from academia and industry, including clinicians, computer scientists and industry representatives. These working groups focused on: Data Use, Data Structure, Data Exploration, and Data Governance. After working group and panel discussions, a modified Delphi process was conducted.

resultsThe resulting Delphi consensus provides conceptualized and structured recommendations for each domain related to surgical video data. We identified the key stakeholders within the data lifecycle and formulated comprehensive, easily understandable, and widely applicable guidelines for data utilization. Standardization of data structure should encompass format and quality, data sources, documentation, metadata, and account for biases within the data. To foster scientific data exploration, datasets should reflect diversity and remain adaptable to future applications. Data governance must be transparent to all stakeholders, addressing legal and ethical considerations surrounding the data.

conclusionThis consensus presents essential recommendations around the generation of standardized and diverse surgical video databanks, accounting for multiple stakeholders involved in data generation and use throughout its lifecycle. Following the SAGES annotation framework, we lay the foundation for standardization of data use, structure, and exploration. A detailed exploration of requirements for adequate data governance will follow.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceQuality ImprovementData CollectionHumansAIDelphi consensusEducationSurgical AISurgical data science

Identifiers

PMID37516693
PMCPMC10616217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.