ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
Can Chat GPT be Utilized in Scientific and Undergraduate Studies?
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Detection with Video-Based Hybrid Deep Learning from Brain MRI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Can AI write your code? A case study of chatgpt's statistical coding capabilities for quantitative research.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Training and Technology Acceptance of ChatGPT in University Students of Social Sciences: A Netcoincidental Analysis.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Emergency Medicine Assistants in the Field of Toxicology, Comparison of ChatGPT-3.5 and GEMINI Artificial Intelligence Systems.Acta medica Lituanic · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence - A Reality or Myth.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodonticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we are investigating the academic usability of Chat GPT, which has been gaining increasing popularity recently, as well as its potential for use in undergraduate study. In this context, based on our experiments, we believe that Chat GPT needs further development in certain aspects. While it shows promising potential for academic research in the future, currently, it can be stated that there is a need for improvement in this regard. But we foresee that Chat GPT can be used more effectively in undergraduate study. In our experience, Chat GPT has provided very reasonable results in this regard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37516681What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.