ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
ChatGPT and Clinical Decision Support: Scope, Application, and Limitations.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the applicability of AI chatbots in addressing health management issues for living kidney donors.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Performance of GPT-based large language models in hepatocellular carcinoma stratification: liver function assessment, BCLC staging, and treatment recommendations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the reliability of large language models for ASA-PS classification in cardiovascular surgery: a pilot study.JA clinical reports · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Injury Prediction Tools: Simplifying User Interactions and Improving Risk Interpretation.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary expert evaluation of large language models on questions regarding bariatric surgery: a comparative analysis of ERNIE Bot 4.0, ChatGPT-4, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini Pro.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Benchmark evaluation of large language models for clinical decision support in headache management.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
- Does the Quality and Readability of Information Related to Varicocele Obtained from ChatGPT 4.0 Remain Consistent Across Different Models of Inquiry?The world journal of men's health · 2026Article
- The temporal changes in GPT-4 performance on UKMLA practice questions: educational and clinical implications.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Concordance Between ChatGPT and Multidisciplinary Teams in Breast Cancer Treatment Planning: A Study from Bosnia and Herzegovina.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Can AI match emergency physicians in managing common emergency cases? A comparative performance evaluation.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- ChatGPT in Oncology Diagnosis and Treatment: Applications, Legal and Ethical Challenges.Current oncology reports · 2025Review
- Predicting COPD Readmission: An Intelligent Clinical Decision Support System.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Qwen-2.5 Outperforms Other Large Language Models in the Chinese National Nursing Licensing Examination: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Quantum leap in medical mentorship: exploring ChatGPT's transition from textbooks to terabytes.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT to seek oncological information: a qualitative study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Assessing AI in Various Elements of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)-Guided Ankle Fracture Treatment: A Comparative Analysis with Expert Agreement.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management in the Intensive Care Unit.Critical care research and practice · 2025Review
- The I-KAPCAM-AI-Q: a novel instrument for evaluating health care providers' AI awareness in Italy.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Using Large Language Models to Retrieve Critical Data from Clinical Processes and Business Rules.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines ChatGPT's role in clinical decision support, by analyzing its scope, application, and limitations. By analyzing patient data and providing evidence-based recommendations, ChatGPT, an AI language model, can help healthcare professionals make well-informed decisions. This study examines ChatGPT's use in clinical decision support, including diagnosis and treatment planning. However, it acknowledges limitations like biases, lack of contextual understanding, and human oversight and also proposes a framework for the future clinical decision support system. Understanding these factors will allow healthcare professionals to utilize ChatGPT effectively and make accurate clinical decisions. Further research is needed to understand the implications of using ChatGPT in healthcare settings and to develop safeguards for responsible use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37516680What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.