Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37515745›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2023

The Exploration of Cannabis and Cannabinoid Therapies for Migraine.

Brijesh Chandwani, Brooklyn A Bradley, Anna Pace, Dawn C Buse, Ravinder Singh, Deena Kuruvilla

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Brijesh ChandwaniDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts University, 1 Kneeland St, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. brij@nyctmj.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4188-2639
Brooklyn A BradleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Anna PaceDepartment of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Dawn C BuseDepartment of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Ravinder SinghPremier Neurology Medical Group, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
Deena KuruvillaWestport Headache Institute, Westport, CT, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USCardiovascular Medical Group · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USTufts University · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThere is increasing interest in the use of cannabis and cannabinoid therapies (CCT) by the general population and among people with headache disorders, which results in a need for healthcare professionals to be well versed with the efficacy and safety data. In this manuscript, we review cannabis and cannabinoid terminology, the endocannabinoid system and its role in the central nervous system (CNS), the data on efficacy, safety, tolerability, and potential pitfalls associated with use in people with migraine and headache disorders. We also propose possible mechanisms of action in headache disorders and debunk commonly held myths about its use. RECENT

findingsPreliminary studies show that CCT have evidence for the management of migraine. While this evidence exists, further randomized, controlled studies are needed to better support its clinical use. CCT can be considered an integrative treatment added to mainstream medicine for people with migraine who are refractory to treatment and/or exhibit disability and/or interest in trying these therapies. Further studies are warranted to specify appropriate formulation, dosage, and indication(s). Although not included in guidelines or the AHS 2021 Consensus Statement on migraine therapies, with the legalization of CCT for medical or unrestricted use across the USA, recent systematic reviews highlighting the preliminary evidence for its use in migraine, it is vital for clinicians to be well versed in the efficacy, safety, and clinical considerations for their use. This review provides information which can help people with migraine and clinicians who care for them make mutual, well-informed decisions on the use of cannabis and cannabinoid therapies for migraine based on the existing data.

Indexed as

CannabinoidsCannabisMedical MarijuanaMigraine DisordersCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsHumansMidazolamCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCannabinoidsMedical MarijuanaMidazolamCannabidiolCannabinoidsCBDMigraineTHC

Identifiers

PMID37515745
OpenAlexW4385380082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.