Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37515701›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2024

Pattern of practice of re-irradiation for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in Italy: a survey by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO).

Mariangela Massaccesi, Antonella Fontana, Isabella Palumbo, Angela Argenone, Maria Carmen De Santis, Valeria Masiello, Antonio Pontoriero, Antonella Ciabattoni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Mariangela MassaccesiRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonella FontanaRadiotherapy Department, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy.
Isabella PalumboRadiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Sant'Andrea delle Fratte, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, 06156, Perugia, Italy. isabella.palumbo@unipg.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4443-3954
Angela ArgenoneRadiotherapy Department, San Pio Hospital, Benevento, Italy.
Maria Carmen De SantisRadiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Valeria MasielloRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonio PontorieroRadiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Antonella CiabattoniRadiotherapy Department, San Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Rome 1, Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITOspedale San Filippo Neri · ITOspedale Santa Maria Goretti · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Re-irradiation and the Breast Cancer Working Groups of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) conducted a survey to provide an overview of the policies for breast cancer (BC) re-irradiation (re-RT) among the Italian radiotherapy (RT) centers.

methodsIn October 2021, 183 RT centers were invited to answer a survey: after an initial section about general aspects, the questionnaire focused on radiation oncologists' (ROs) attitude toward re-RT in three different scenarios: ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) treated with second conservative surgery, IBTR treated with mastectomy and inoperable IBTR. Surveyed ROs were also asked to express their interest in being involved in a prospective trials.

resultsSeventy-seven/183 (42.0%) centers answered the Survey, only one RO per center was requested to answer. In particular, 86.5% ROs declared to have performed "curative" re-RT for IBTR during the previous two years (2019-2020): 76.7% respondents administered re-RT after second BCS, 50.9% after mastectomy, and 48.1% for inoperable IBTR. Re-RT practice varied widely among centers in terms of treatment volumes, dose and fractionation schedules, techniques and dose-volume constraints for organs at risks (OARs). Forty-six participants (59.7%) expressed their interest in participating in a prospective study investigating BC re-RT.

conclusionsAbout one out of three RT centers in Italy delivered re-RT for IBTR. Nevertheless, practice of re-RT varied widely among centers highlighting the needs for prospective studies to improve knowledge in this field.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRe-IrradiationFemaleHumansMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMedical OncologyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesReactive Oxygen SpeciesSurveys and QuestionnairesReactive Oxygen SpeciesBreast cancerIpsilateral breast tumor recurrenceRe-irradiationSurvey

Identifiers

PMID37515701
OpenAlexW4385380597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.