Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37515695›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2023

Outcomes of Staple Line Reinforcement Following Robotic Assisted Sleeve Gastrectomy Based on MBSAQIP Database.

David Faugno-Fusci, John Perrone, Allincia Michaud, Jill Stoltzfus, Luis A Alvarado, Maher El Chaar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Use of Lower Staple Heights in Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy: National Trends and Impact on Outcomes.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David Faugno-FusciDepartment of Surgery, St Luke's University Hospital and Health Network, 1736 Hamilton Street, Allentown, PA, 18104, USA.
John PerroneDepartment of Surgery, St Luke's University Hospital and Health Network, 1736 Hamilton Street, Allentown, PA, 18104, USA.
Allincia MichaudSt Luke's University Hospital and Health Network-Research Institute, 801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, USA.
Jill StoltzfusSt Luke's University Hospital and Health Network-Research Institute, 801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, USA.
Luis A AlvaradoSt Luke's University Hospital and Health Network-Research Institute, 801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, USA.
Maher El ChaarDepartment of Surgery, St Luke's University Hospital and Health Network, 1736 Hamilton Street, Allentown, PA, 18104, USA. Maher.elchaar@sluhn.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5143-9257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes for Staple Line Reinforcement (SLR) in RA-SG based on the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database for 2019. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe selected patients who underwent RA-SG in the MBSAQIP PUF (Public Utility File) for the year 2019 and grouped them based on their SLR status: Oversewing (OS), Buttressing (BR), both OS and BR and neither. Our primary outcomes were bleeding, organ space infection (OSI), and adverse events (AEs), and our secondary outcomes were operation length, hospital length of stay, readmissions, and conversion to open rates. We conducted separate chi square or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) as appropriate and multivariable direct logistic regression models for the categorical outcomes.

resultsWe found 115,621 patients with complete data of which there were 16,494 who underwent RA-SG. Our results did not show a statistically significant decrease in incidence of postoperative bleeding for BR and OS (Adjusted OR = 0.782, p = 0.2291 and Adjusted OR of 0.482, p = 0.054 for BR and OS respectively). There was a statistically significant effect for SLR status on operation length, with OS patients having the highest operative times (log-transformed mean = 2.03), followed by both BR + OS patients (log-transformed mean = 1.99). BR patients had the shortest operation length.

conclusionSLR did not result in any significant differences related to bleeding, OSI or AEs following RA-SG according to MBSAQIP for the year 2019. However, OS resulted in significantly longer operative time compared to BR alone.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidRobotic Surgical ProceduresGastrectomyHumansQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeButtressing (BR)Oversewing (OS)Robotic Assisted (RA-) surgerySleeve GastrectomyStaple Line Reinforcement (SLR)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.