ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2023
Multi-omics analysis of multiple myeloma patients with differential response to first-line treatment.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed a potential association between ELK3 expression and the progression of multiple myeloma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Titin gene mutations enhance radiotherapy efficacy via modulation of tumour immune microenvironment in rectum adenocarcinoma.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Autoimmune Diseases and Plasma Cells Dyscrasias: Pathogenetic, Molecular and Prognostic Correlations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The genome backgrounds of multiple myeloma (MM) would affect the efficacy of specific treatment. However, the mutational and transcriptional landscapes in MM patients with differential response to first-line treatment remains unclear. We collected paired whole-exome sequencing (WES) and transcriptomic data of over 200 MM cases from MMRF-COMPASS project. R package, maftools was applied to analyze the somatic mutations and mutational signatures across MM samples. Differential expressed genes (DEG) was calculated using R package, DESeq2. The feature selection of the predictive model was determined by LASSO regression. In silico analysis revealed newly discovered recurrent mutated genes such as TTN, MUC16. TP53 mutation was observed more frequent in nonCR (complete remission) group with poor prognosis. DNA repair-associated mutational signatures were enriched in CR patients. Transcriptomic profiling showed that the activity of NF-kappa B and TGF-β pathways was suppressed in CR patients. A transcriptome-based response predictive model was constructed and showed promising predictive accuracy in MM patients receiving first-line treatment. Our study delineated distinctive mutational and transcriptional landscapes in MM patients with differential response to first-line treatment. Furthermore, we constructed a 20-gene predictive model which showed promising accuracy in predicting treatment response in newly diagnosed MM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.