Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2023
Phase II study of border zone stereotactic radiosurgery with bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or progressive glioblastoma multiforme.
Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review of Advances Published in the Second Half of 2023.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Stereotactic radiosurgery versus combined stereotactic radiosurgery and bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma; a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Intraoperative technological advances and new frontiers in precision glioma surgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical GBM hybrid artificial intelligence for prescription dose recommendation and outcome prediction after gamma knife radiosurgery treatment: a proof-of-concept.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Design, Conduct, and Analysis of Externally Controlled Trials.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Treatment mechanism and research progress of bevacizumab for glioblastoma.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
- Stimulation of tumoricidal immunity via bacteriotherapy inhibits glioblastoma relapse.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Unexpected "Lazarus response" to single-agent bevacizumab in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRecurrent glioblastoma is universally fatal with limited effective treatment options. The aim of this phase 2 study of Border Zone SRS plus bevacizumab was to evaluate OS in patients with recurrent GBM.
methodsPatients with histologically confirmed GBM with recurrent disease who had received prior first-line treatment with fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy and eligible for SRS were enrolled. Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg was given day -1, day 14, and then every 14 days until disease progression. 1-14 days before BZ-SRS procedure, patients underwent brain MRI /MRS. MRS with measurement of choline-to-N-acetyl aspartate index (CNI) area ≥ 3 was targeted for SRS.
resultsFrom 2015-2017, sixteen of planned 40 patients were enrolled. The median age was 62 (range, 48-74Y). 3/16 (0.188) participants experienced grade 2 toxicity. No AREs were reported. The mOS was 11.73 months compared to 8.74 months (P = 0.324) from date of SRS for the BZ-SRS and institutional historical controls, respectively. PFS-6 and OS-6 were 31.2% (p = 0.00294) and 81.2%(p = 0.058), respectively. Of 13 evaluable for best response: 1 CR (p = 0.077), 4 PR (p = 0.308), 7 SD (p = 0.538), and 1 PD (p = 0.077). 11/16 participants had MRS scans with an estimated probability that MRS changes a treatment plan of 0 (0, 0.285).
conclusionBZ-SRS with bevacizumab was feasible and well tolerated. There is no significant survival benefit using BZ-SRS with bevacizumab compared to institutional historical controls. Secondary analysis revealed a trend toward improved PFS-6, but not OS-6 after BZ-SRS. MRS scans did not result in changes to SRS treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.