Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37515662›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

An in-depth analysis of parameter settings and probability distributions of specific ordinal patterns in the Shannon permutation entropy during different states of consciousness in humans.

Michelle Franka, Alexander Edthofer, Andreas Körner, Sandra Widmann, Thomas Fenzl, Gerhard Schneider, Matthias Kreuzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle FrankaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander EdthoferInstitute of Analysis and Scientific Computing, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas KörnerInstitute of Analysis and Scientific Computing, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Sandra WidmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas FenzlDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Gerhard SchneiderDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Matthias KreuzerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. m.kreuzer@tum.de.

Funding

Elite Graduate Program Biomedical Neuroscience S-LW-2016-351/2/58
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As electrical activity in the brain has complex and dynamic properties, the complexity measure permutation entropy (PeEn) has proven itself to reliably distinguish consciousness states recorded by the EEG. However, it has been shown that the focus on specific ordinal patterns instead of all of them produced similar results. Moreover, parameter settings influence the resulting PeEn value. We evaluated the impact of the embedding dimension m and the length of the EEG segment on the resulting PeEn. Moreover, we analysed the probability distributions of monotonous and non-occurring ordinal patterns in different parameter settings. We based our analyses on simulated data as well as on EEG recordings from volunteers, obtained during stable anaesthesia levels at defined, individualised concentrations. The results of the analysis on the simulated data show a dependence of PeEn on different influencing factors such as window length and embedding dimension. With the EEG data, we demonstrated that the probability P of monotonous patterns performs like PeEn in lower embedding dimension (m = 3, AUC = 0.88, [0.7, 1] in both), whereas the probability P of non-occurring patterns outperforms both methods in higher embedding dimensions (m = 5, PeEn: AUC = 0.91, [0.77, 1]; P(non-occurring patterns): AUC = 1, [1, 1]). We showed that the accuracy of PeEn in distinguishing consciousness states changes with different parameter settings. Furthermore, we demonstrated that for the purpose of separating wake from anaesthesia EEG solely pieces of information used for PeEn calculation, i.e., the probability of monotonous patterns or the number of non-occurring patterns may be equally functional.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaConsciousnessBrainElectroencephalographyEntropyHumansProbabilityComplexity measuresEEGMonitoringPermutation entropy

Identifiers

PMID37515662
PMCPMC10995010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.