Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37515528›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Involvement of people who use alcohol and other drug services in the development of patient-reported measures of experience: A scoping review.

Anke E van der Sterren, Sally Nathan, Patrick Rawstorne, Elisabeth Yarbakhsh, Chris Gough, Devin Bowles

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Involvement of people who use alcohol and other drug services in the development of patient-reported measures of experience: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anke E van der SterrenAlcohol Tobacco and Other Drug Association ACT (ATODA), Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9406-1618
Sally NathanSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1960-1063
Patrick RawstorneSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Elisabeth YarbakhshAlcohol Tobacco and Other Drug Association ACT (ATODA), Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Chris GoughCanberra Alliance for Harm Minimisation and Advocacy (CAHMA), Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Devin BowlesAlcohol Tobacco and Other Drug Association ACT (ATODA), Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Alcohol and Drug Foundation · AUUNSW Sydney · AUAlliance College of Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient-reported measures that assess satisfaction and experience are increasingly utilised in healthcare sectors, including the alcohol and other drug (AOD) sector. This scoping review identifies how and to what extent people accessing AOD services have been involved in the development of satisfaction and experience measures to date.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest, Google and Google Scholar were searched. Included papers described the development and/or implementation of a multiple-item measure of patient-reported experience or satisfaction specifically for people accessing AOD treatment and/or harm reduction programmes. If there was more than one paper, key papers were chosen that described each measure. The method of development, including service user involvement, was assessed against a framework generated for this review. Two reviewers were involved at each stage.

resultsThirty measures-23 satisfaction and 7 experience-were identified. Sixteen measures reported some level of involvement by people accessing AOD services in their development, although, for most measures, at a relatively low level. This involvement increased over the time span of the review becoming more frequent in later years. Only four measures were developed for use in harm reduction-specific settings, and fewer than half reported undertaking analysis of underlying scale structure and constructs.

conclusionSeveral gaps could be addressed to enhance the measurement of patient-centred care in the AOD sector, including: developing experience measures for use in harm reduction settings and across various AOD settings in a service system; improved reporting of psychometric properties of these measures and increasing commitment to the meaningful involvement of AOD service users in measure development. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This scoping review is part of a broader codesign project that involves a partnership between the peak organisation for AOD services and the peer-based AOD consumer organisation in the Australian Capital Territory, Australia. These organisations are working closely together to engage with AOD service users, service providers and policy makers in this codesign project. As such, the Executive Director of the peer-based AOD consumer organisation is involved as a co-author of this scoping review.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePersonal SatisfactionAustraliaHumansPatient Reported Outcome Measuresmeasure developmentpatient experiencepatient satisfactionperson-centred careservice user involvement

Identifiers

PMID37515528
PMCPMC10632652
OpenAlexW4385380089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.