ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2024
Motion Robust MR Fingerprinting Scan to Image Neonates With Prenatal Opioid Exposure.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A MR Fingerprinting Development Kit for Quantitative 3D Brain Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Time-resolved MR fingerprinting for TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Efficient pulse sequence design framework for high-dimensional MR fingerprinting scans using systematic error index.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- High-resolution myelin-water fraction and quantitative relaxation mapping using 3D ViSTa-MR fingerprinting.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- High-resolution myelin-water fraction and quantitative relaxation mapping using 3D ViSTa-MR fingerprinting.ArXiv · 2023Article
- 3D MR fingerprinting-derived myelin water fraction characterizing brain development and leukodystrophy.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo explore whether MR fingerprinting (MRF) scans provide motion-robust and quantitative brain tissue measurements for non-sedated infants with prenatal opioid exposure (POE). STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: 13 infants with POE (3 male; 12 newborns (age 7-65 days) and 1 infant aged 9-months). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T, 3D T1-weighted MPRAGE, 3D T2-weighted TSE and MRF sequences. ASSESSMENT: The image quality of MRF and MRI was assessed in a fully crossed, multiple-reader, multiple-case study. Sixteen image quality features in three types-image artifacts, structure and myelination visualization-were ranked by four neuroradiologists (8, 7, 5, and 8 years of experience respectively), using a 3-point scale. MRF T1 and T2 values in 8 white matter brain regions were compared between babies younger than 1 month and babies between 1 and 2 months. STATISTICAL TESTS: Generalized estimating equations model to test the significance of differences of regional T1 and T2 values of babies under 1 month and those older. MRI and MRF image quality was assessed using Gwet's second order auto-correlation coefficient (AC
resultsThe MRF of two infants were excluded in T1 and T2 value analysis due to severe motion artifact but were included in the image quality assessment. In infants under 1 month of age (N = 6), the T1 and T2 values were significantly higher compared to those between 1 and 2 months of age (N = 4). MRF images showed significantly higher image quality ratings in all three feature types compared to MRI images.
conclusionsMR Fingerprinting scans have potential to be a motion-robust and efficient method for nonsedated infants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.