ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2024
Detection of Dolichoectasia and Atherosclerosis by Automated MRA Tortuosity Metrics in a Population-Based Study.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship between Vascular Tortuosity Rate and Atherosclerotic Risk Factors in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Article
- Cerebral vascular tortuosity and aneurysm formation and rupture: a novel vessel tortuosity scale.Experimental neurology · 2026Article
- Detection, cerebrovascular complications and risk factors associated with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia: a scoping review.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntracranial vessel tortuosity is a key component of dolichoectasia and has been associated with atherosclerosis and adverse neurologic outcomes. However, the evaluation of tortuosity is mainly a descriptive assessment. PURPOSE: To compare the performance of three automated tortuosity metrics (angle metric [AM], distance metric [DM], and distance-to-axis metric [DTA]) for detection of dolichoectasia and presence of segment-specific plaques. STUDY TYPE: Observational, cross-sectional metric assessment. POPULATION: 1899 adults from the general population; mean age = 76 years, female = 59%, and black = 29%. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight MRA and 3D vessel wall MRI. ASSESSMENT: Tortuosity metrics and mean luminal area were quantified for designated segments of the internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery, vertebral artery, and entire length of basilar artery (BA). Qualitative interpretations of BA dolichoectasia were assessed based on Smoker's visual criteria. STATISTICAL TESTS: Descriptive statistics (2-sample t-tests, Pearson chi-square tests) for group comparisons. Receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (AUC) for detection of BA dolichoectasia or segment-specific plaque. Model inputs included 1) tortuosity metrics, 2) mean luminal area, and 3) demographics (age, race, and sex).
resultsQualitative dolichoectasia was identified in 336 (18%) participants, and atherosclerotic plaques were detected in 192 (10%) participants. AM-, DM-, and DTA-calculated tortuosity were good individual discriminators of basilar dolichoectasia (AUCs: 0.76, 0.74, and 0.75, respectively), with model performance improving with the mean lumen area: (AUCs: 0.88, 0.87, and 0.87, respectively). Combined characteristics (tortuosity and mean luminal area) identified plaques with better performance in the anterior (AUCs ranging from 0.66 to 0.78) than posterior (AUCs ranging from 0.54 to 0.65) circulation, with all models improving by the addition of demographics (AUCs ranging from 0.62 to 0.84). DATA
conclusionQuantitative vessel tortuosity metrics yield good diagnostic accuracy for the detection of dolichoectasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.