Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37515004›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Knowledge, Perception, and Acceptance of HPV Vaccination and Screening for Cervical Cancer among Saudi Females: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Khulud Ahmad Rezq, Maadiah Algamdi, Raghad Alanazi, Sarah Alanazi, Fatmah Alhujairy, Radwa Albalawi, Wafa Al-Zamaa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khulud Ahmad RezqNursing Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0037-5024
Maadiah AlgamdiNursing Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8775-1450
Raghad AlanaziNursing Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah AlanaziNursing Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia.
Fatmah AlhujairyNursing Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia.
Radwa AlbalawiNursing Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia.
Wafa Al-ZamaaNursing Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia.
University of Tabuk · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) ranks as the eighth most prevalent malignancy in Saudi Arabian women of all ages. This cross-sectional study intends to assess women's knowledge, perceptions, and acceptance concerning HPV vaccination and CC screening in Saudi Arabia as well as the contributing variables to women's screening and vaccine acceptability. Data were collected between 1 April 2023 and 30 May 2023 through online questionnaires. Out of 421 responses, 70% of the studied sample had fair knowledge, and 30% had good knowledge related to cervical cancer screening and vaccine. Only 1.9% of the participants had a positive perception, while 41% of the participants had a negative perception toward cervical cancer screening and vaccine. A total of 38% of the participants were fearful of the side effects of the vaccine, while 22.2% doubted the effectiveness of the vaccine. Acceptance was much better correlated with perception (Rho = 0.47) than with knowledge (Rho = 0.177). However, this correlation remains weak. We conclude that Saudi women still have a poor understanding or impression of cervical cancer and prevention methods. Fear of the vaccination's negative effects and skepticism about the effectiveness of the vaccine/screening have recently been the most often-mentioned hurdles to vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

HPV vaccinationknowledgeperceptionSaudi Arabiascreening

Identifiers

PMID37515004
PMCPMC10385735
OpenAlexW4382983235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.