Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37514948›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Decrease in Overall Vaccine Hesitancy in College Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Kendall Pogue, Jessica D Altman, Abigail A Lee, Dashiell S Miner, Ty J Skyles, Ruth J Bodily, Triston B Crook, Bryce U Nielson, Kaitlyn Hinton, Lydia Busacker and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kendall PogueDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Jessica D AltmanDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Abigail A LeeDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Dashiell S MinerDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Ty J SkylesDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Ruth J BodilyDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Triston B CrookDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Bryce U NielsonDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6372-0222
Kaitlyn HintonDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Lydia BusackerDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Zoe E MechamDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Agnes M RoseDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Scott BlackDepartment of English, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Brian D PooleDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3205-640X
Brigham Young University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic changed our world as we know it and continues to be a global problem three years since the pandemic began. Several vaccines were produced, but there was a considerable amount of societal turmoil surrounding them that has affected the way people view not only COVID-19 vaccines but all vaccines. We used a survey to compare how attitudes towards vaccination have changed in college students during the pandemic. An initial survey was administered in 2021, then a follow-up in 2022. Out of 316 respondents who answered the first survey, 192 completed the follow-up. The survey was designed to measure trends in changes to vaccine attitudes since the COVID-19 pandemic began. By comparing the first survey in 2021 and the follow-up, we found that roughly 55% of respondents' vaccine attitudes did not change, roughly 44% of respondents' attitudes towards vaccines became more positive, and only about 1% of the respondents' vaccine attitudes became more negative. Improved view of vaccines was associated with political views and increased trust in medicine and the healthcare system. Worsened opinions of vaccines were associated with a belief that the COVID-19 vaccine affected fertility.

Indexed as

COVID-19protective equipmentvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID37514948
PMCPMC10384532
OpenAlexW4381685855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.