ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Estimation of Left and Right Ventricular Ejection Fractions from cine-MRI Using 3D-CNN.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semi-supervised deep learning for uterus and bladder segmentation on female pelvic floor magnetic resonance imaging with limited labeled data.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Automatic Aortic Valve Extraction Using Deep Learning with Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac CT Images.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- Segmentation-Free Estimation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using 3D CNN Is Reliable and Improves as Multiple Cardiac MRI Cine Orientations Are Combined.Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac function indices must be calculated using tracing from short-axis images in cine-MRI. A 3D-CNN (convolutional neural network) that adds time series information to images can estimate cardiac function indices without tracing using images with known values and cardiac cycles as the input. Since the short-axis image depicts the left and right ventricles, it is unclear which motion feature is captured. This study aims to estimate the indices by learning the short-axis images and the known left and right ventricular ejection fractions and to confirm the accuracy and whether each index is captured as a feature. A total of 100 patients with publicly available short-axis cine images were used. The dataset was divided into training:test = 8:2, and a regression model was built by training with the 3D-ResNet50. Accuracy was assessed using a five-fold cross-validation. The correlation coefficient, MAE (mean absolute error), and RMSE (root mean squared error) were determined as indices of accuracy evaluation. The mean correlation coefficient of the left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.80, MAE was 9.41, and RMSE was 12.26. The mean correlation coefficient of the right ventricular ejection fraction was 0.56, MAE was 11.35, and RMSE was 14.95. The correlation coefficient was considerably higher for the left ventricular ejection fraction. Regression modeling using the 3D-CNN indicated that the left ventricular ejection fraction was estimated more accurately, and left ventricular systolic function was captured as a feature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.