Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37514860›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Reliability and Accuracy of a Fall Risk Assessment Procedure Using Mobile Smartphone Sensors Compared with a Physiological Profile Assessment.

José-Francisco Pedrero-Sánchez, Helios De-Rosario-Martínez, Enrique Medina-Ripoll, David Garrido-Jaén, Pilar Serra-Añó, Sara Mollà-Casanova, Juan López-Pascual

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. FallskipGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

José-Francisco Pedrero-SánchezInstituto de Biomecánica (IBV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Edificio 9C, Camino de Vera S/N, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4384-0715
Helios De-Rosario-MartínezInstituto de Biomecánica (IBV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Edificio 9C, Camino de Vera S/N, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Enrique Medina-RipollInstituto de Biomecánica (IBV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Edificio 9C, Camino de Vera S/N, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-0846
David Garrido-JaénInstituto de Biomecánica (IBV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Edificio 9C, Camino de Vera S/N, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Pilar Serra-AñóUnidad de Biomecánica Clínica (UBIC), Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Universitat de València, Carrer Gascó Oliag 5, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0743-3445
Sara Mollà-CasanovaUnidad de Biomecánica Clínica (UBIC), Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Universitat de València, Carrer Gascó Oliag 5, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3700-9968
Juan López-PascualInstituto de Biomecánica (IBV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Edificio 9C, Camino de Vera S/N, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Universitat Politècnica de València · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

EU FEDER PID2021-125694OB-I00Generalitat Valenciana, Conselleria d'Innovació, Universitats, Ciència i Societat CIAICO/2021/215Ministry of Science and Innovation CER-20211003Universitat de València INV19-01-13-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Falls in older people are a major health concern as the leading cause of disability and the second most common cause of accidental death. We developed a rapid fall risk assessment based on a combination of physical performance measurements made with an inertial sensor embedded in a smartphone. This study aimed to evaluate and validate the reliability and accuracy of an easy-to-use smartphone fall risk assessment by comparing it with the Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA) results. Sixty-five participants older than 55 performed a variation of the Timed Up and Go test using smartphone sensors. Balance and gait parameters were calculated, and their reliability was assessed by the (ICC) and compared with the PPAs. Since the PPA allows classification into six levels of fall risk, the data obtained from the smartphone assessment were categorised into six equivalent levels using different parametric and nonparametric classifier models with neural networks. The F1 score and geometric mean of each model were also calculated. All selected parameters showed ICCs around 0.9. The best classifier, in terms of accuracy, was the nonparametric mixed input data model with a 100% success rate in the classification category. In conclusion, fall risk can be reliably assessed using a simple, fast smartphone protocol that allows accurate fall risk classification among older people and can be a useful screening tool in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsSmartphoneAgedHumansPostural BalanceReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentTime and Motion Studiesfall riskinertial sensorsPhysiological Profile AssessmentsmartphoneTimed Up and Go

Identifiers

PMID37514860
PMCPMC10385364
OpenAlexW4385068602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.