Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37514575›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Compact Snake Optimization Algorithm in the Application of WKNN Fingerprint Localization.

Weimin Zheng, Senyuan Pang, Ning Liu, Qingwei Chai, Lindong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weimin ZhengCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
Senyuan PangCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
Ning LiuCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
Qingwei ChaiCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5587-0589
Lindong XuCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor localization has broad application prospects, but accurately obtaining the location of test points (TPs) in narrow indoor spaces is a challenge. The weighted K-nearest neighbor algorithm (WKNN) is a powerful localization algorithm that can improve the localization accuracy of TPs. In recent years, with the rapid development of metaheuristic algorithms, it has shown efficiency in solving complex optimization problems. The main research purpose of this article is to study how to use metaheuristic algorithms to improve indoor positioning accuracy and verify the effectiveness of heuristic algorithms in indoor positioning. This paper presents a new algorithm called compact snake optimization (cSO). The novel algorithm introduces a compact strategy to the snake optimization (SO) algorithm, which ensures optimal performance in situations with limited computing and memory resources. The performance of cSO is evaluated on 28 test functions of CEC2013 and compared with several intelligent computing algorithms. The results demonstrate that cSO outperforms these algorithms. Furthermore, we combine the cSO algorithm with WKNN fingerprint positioning and RSSI positioning. The simulation experiments demonstrate that the cSO algorithm can effectively reduce positioning errors.

Indexed as

compactRSSI localizationsnake optimizationWKNN

Identifiers

PMID37514575
PMCPMC10383412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.