ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Integrated Edge Deployable Fault Diagnostic Algorithm for the Internet of Things (IoT): A Methane Sensing Application.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) is seen as the most viable solution for real-time monitoring applications. But the faults occurring at the perception layer are prone to misleading the data driven system and consume higher bandwidth and power. Thus, the goal of this effort is to provide an edge deployable sensor-fault detection and identification algorithm to reduce the detection, identification, and repair time, save network bandwidth and decrease the computational stress over the Cloud. Towards this, an integrated algorithm is formulated to detect fault at source and to identify the root cause element(s), based on Random Forest (RF) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). The RF classifier is employed to detect the fault, while the FTA is utilized to identify the source. A Methane (CH4) sensing application is used as a case-study to test the proposed system in practice. We used data from a healthy CH4 sensing node, which was injected with different forms of faults, such as sensor module faults, processor module faults and communication module faults, to assess the proposed model's performance. The proposed integrated algorithm provides better algorithm-complexity, execution time and accuracy when compared to FTA or standalone classifiers such as RF, Support Vector Machine (SVM) or K-nearest Neighbor (KNN). Metrics such as Accuracy, True Positive Rate (TPR), Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), False Negative Rate (FNR), Precision and F1-score are used to rank the proposed methodology. From the field experiment, RF produced 97.27% accuracy and outperformed both SVM and KNN. Also, the suggested integrated methodology's experimental findings demonstrated a 27.73% reduced execution time with correct fault-source and less computational resource, compared to traditional FTA-detection methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.